On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 08:05:39PM -0500, Aaron Spike wrote:
On 06/16/2011 05:34 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> Let's just agree that here and now we need a decision, and that
> decision should be communicated to PacktPub in a timely manner. I can
> wrap up our reply, what ever it would turn out to be, in nice words
> and pass it on. I've done it before, I can do it again. But continuous
> lack of decision despite of pinging and pinging and pinging committee
> members simply makes us look bad. To me this is unacceptable.
I agree! But I must not have been one of the aforementioned "pingged".
What exactly are we deciding this time? Last I remember Bradley was
working directly with Packt to arrange payment and I see their books
listed on our site. I thought I had been watching the -board list
closely, but I confess that I missed whatever you sent. I apologize if
I'm the only one who doesn't know what's going on here. What remains to
I seem not to have been on the pingee list either; as well, I see no
mention in the archives for this list for a decision on something
relating to Packt in recent months, which is where proposals for votes
are supposed to be posted. The last requested vote was Sept, and looks
like there was a sufficient quorum for that vote.