Yes, I just used this "polymorphic function pointer" std::function<SPObject* ()> for the factory, this can be replaced by a normal function pointer. Then there's one nested exception and some nullptrs. Btw: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14153725/installing-gcc-4-7-1-on-os-x I'm using gcc 4.7 for compiling Inkscape and it just works fine.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Alex Valavanis [mailto:valavanisalex@...400...] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. April 2013 18:30 An: Markus Engel Cc: Inkscape Devel List Betreff: Re: [Inkscape-devel] C++ification of the SPObject tree
Sounds great! Is there any way to avoid C++11 for the moment though? As I understand it, there isn't a suitable version of GCC available on OS X yet.
On 11 April 2013 16:57, Markus Engel <p637777@...1081...> wrote:
Hi there, now I finally managed to get rid of the GObject type system and merged all the virtual pads with their classes. It should work quite well, although I still have to figure out what to do with those "rdf:RDF" and
"inkscape:grid"
nodes. If you want to try it, please add a CXXFLAGS="-std=c++11" to your configure line ;). Who of you is currently working on the guides-improvement? Is there any special reason why you use "g_object_class_install_property" instead of "normal" properties?
Markus
-------- Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account! http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter _______________________________________________ Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel