27 Mar
2007
27 Mar
'07
8:14 a.m.
There was a wrong quote in my previous mail:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:34:41 +0200 Markus Schwarzenberg <Markus.Schwarzenberg@...1674...> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 07:13:35 -0500 Bob Jamison <rwjj@...127...> wrote:
...
Also, to keep it organized, maybe we should have a namespace- or class-scoped set of names that we use, rather than use the same names as the lib calls?
From a C++ point of view this surely is the cleaner solution.
OTOH someone might ask whether it was sufficient and harmless enough to just provide - where needed - the missing calls with their (std::) names and not to bother the main inkscape feature developer (who had to use something like Inkscape::Math::isnan()
...
Markus