One of the first things we'll do when Frost starts is open up a new Experimental bzr branch. How about if we integrate these new LPEs there, to give them some extra baking time. Then ones that prove to be stable and production-ready after review, can be moved to trunk as appropriate.
Bryce
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 08:23:07PM +0200, Johan Engelen wrote:
Recently, a number of nice new LPEs were posted on the maillist. They look somewhat mature, shall we put them in trunk? This makes it easier to work on them, and may get some more testing done on them. LPEs are very easy to disable later-on down the road if needed, so little risk.
cheers, Johan
On 28-4-2014 20:14, Bryce Harrington wrote:
Exactly my thoughts as well.
Ryan, do you think you could do a quick review in the next day or two to see if you spot any major problem areas? If there's no major rework needed, perhaps we could call Chill done and move on to Frost.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:14:19AM -0700, Josh Andler wrote:
Make sure it's still accurate... I want to add new content, but I think the release getting out sooner is more important. Less work for translation is the better choice for now.
Cheers, Josh On Apr 28, 2014 7:25 AM, "Ryan Lerch" <rlerch@...43...> wrote:
On Sat 26 Apr 2014 06:09:06 PM EDT, Bryce Harrington wrote:
- Chill. √ Development focuses on wrapping up √ Disable features that aren't finished √ Identify 'make distcheck' issues √ Identify any critical OSX/Win32 packaging issues √ Identify remaining writing needed for Release
Notes.
√ Regressions Bug Hunt: 500 points -----> Update tutorials and other docsThe last item in the chill list is updating the tutorials that are shipped with the Inkscape package, including anything under the Help menu. The reason this task needs done in the Chill phase is to give translators plenty of time during Frost and Freeze.
External tutorials are also worth updating of course but aren't schedule-critical so not tracked here.
Ryan, your name was mentioned as someone with an eye on the tutorials, would you mind summarizing what work is already in process relating to tutorials for the Inkscape package?
Bryce
AFAIK, there has not been much work actaully done on the official tutorials. Would the best plan of attack here be to review the 8 official tuts we have now, and just check that they are still "correct" (i.e. no regressions in the instructions due to changes between 0.48 and 0.91)?
or
Should we consider new content for these? (a lot harder, and higher impact for our localization team)
cheers, ryanlerch
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel