On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 16:23 -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, MenTaLguY wrote:
While I'm thinking about it, what SVG version should we indicate in our output?
If we are including SVG 1.2 features like the flow text stuff, don't we almost have to bump the version number to 1.2?
If it would require a 1.2-compliant viewer to view the file, then yeah sorta sounds like you'd want to list it as 1.2. However, will this cause conflicts with other software that may reject SVG 1.2 ? If not, then yeah, couldn't hurt to bump it.
Btw, is there an early version of the SVG spec that we support 100%?
We talked before about SVG Tiny which is a subset of SVG 1.1: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile/
We don't fully support this though yet...mainly because of lack of support for the switch statement declaring multiple profiles.
Jon
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel