----- Forwarded message from Carl Worth <cworth@...573...> ----- Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:11:40 -0700 From: Carl Worth <cworth@...573...> Reply-To: Carl Worth <cworth@...573...> Subject: Re: [cairo] svg_cairo_get_size problem To: Jason Dorje Short <jdorje@...58...>
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 01:55:49 -0400, Jason Dorje Short wrote:
The attached SVGs (chosen for their smallness) show a working and
a
nonworking SVG file. If you use svg2png or xsvg on the cornwall
flag it
will be incorrect, but on the galicia flag it works correctly (or
at
least I think so; if not I have other examples that do work correctly).
The first thing worth noting is that in galicia.svg (which works) the overall size is provided in unit-less values:
width="999.000000" height="666.000000"
which, according to the SVG specification means that these values determine the size in "pixels" (i.e., a px unit as defined by CSS2).
Meanwhile, in cornwall.svg (which fails), the overall size is specified with real-world units (in this case, millimeters):
width="234mm" height="140mm"
So, converting those real-world units to pixels requires information about the real-world dimension of a pixel. In libsvg there's definitely a bug that there's no way to set that value, (instead it always assumes 100 pixels per inch).
But that's not what's causing the strange behavior you're seeing.
In cornwall.svg, after specifying the size as 234x140mm the first thing drawn is the "background" rectangle which has a size specified as:
width="829.133850" height="496.062988"
These values don't have real-world units, so according to the SVG specification[*] they should be interpreted as pixels. And ~ 829x496 pixels is only equivalent to 234x140mm if the pixels are sized such that there are 90 pixels per inch, (which must be the assumed pixels-per-inch value of the tool used to create this file).
Therefore, the overall size of the SVG file changes depending on the pixels-per-inch value, but the actual drawing contents do not. And this is exactly the behavior you're seeing with libsvg-cairo.
My recommendation for you is to just alter the top-level width and height attributes to use the same units as the rest of the drawing. That is, use:
width="829" height="496"
This eliminates the 90 pixels per inch assumption from the file, and also happens to avoid the need for a set_dpi function in libsvg.
It would still be nice to have something like svg_set_dpi but it wouldn't be an adequate solution for this file. It would allow correct rendering at 90 DPI but not at any other value.
Does that make sense? Is there anything else I'm missing here?
-Carl
[*] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-SVG11-20030114/coords.html
----- End forwarded message -----