I think that when you said "commercial" you actually meant "proprietary" (not libre)...
Yes, that's what I meant, thanks for the correction.
Even though it may sound like a minor detail, I stress that because libre fonts can very easily have a commercial aspect (i.e. type designers being paid to improve them) without affecting their freedom aspects.
I agree. I'll be more careful in the future. :) It was not lack of knowing, it was being in too much of a rush. Thanks again for the correction.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:45 AM, C R <cajhne@...400...> wrote:
Calluna Regular, which is currently in use on the website is a commercial font. While it's true that the regular version is offered under a free license, it is not offered under an OFL license, and what's a bit worse,
is
not licensed at all for use in documents, etc. (only desktop/web, and
some
sites want to sell a web license for it, which is worrying).
So... heh.
Anyone want me to work on finding alternatives for that one too? We pretty much need to.
-C
Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel