On 12/25/05, David Christian Berg <david@...407...> wrote:
bt
This is a crash is aspell. Look it up in closed bug reports. As far as I remember the likely reason is that your aspell library is compiled by a different compiler version.
I have followed the discussions... the reason for wanting this is that with gtkmmfication inkscape is getting it's icons rendered by librsvg and I do appreciate this step. This means though, that single files are needed.
So what advantage will librsvg rendering give us? I only see disadvantages (likely slower, not so easy to edit icons, may be surprises with non-compliant rendering), not to mention the "don't fix what is not broken" principle.
I have argued about this extensively in the past, and I had hoped this issue is put to rest. Are there any new reasons to reopen this?
Furthermore it will make it easier for using more stock icons
You can use stock icons just as easily now, and some commands use them. The single icons.svg is not an obstacle to that.
and adding inkscape icons into the stock icons.
That is fine, but if you want to do that, you can easily export the icons you need manually once. It's no reason to break the internal rendering of icons in Inkscape.
So while I suggest to change anything with inkscape as it is right now, it is a small step towards making the gtkmmfication just a tiny bit easier.
If this tiny bit comes at a cost of noticeably degrading performance and/or rendering quality, I have to oppose.
-- bulia byak Inkscape. Draw Freely. http://www.inkscape.org