Hi,
Ok, I understand about LPE's now.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Johan Engelen <jbc.engelen@...2592...> wrote:
On 25-4-2011 10:25, Ilya Baran wrote: > ... > For the real thing, I'd need to find a better mapping
from the "smoothness" slider in Inkscape to my myriad of parameters.
What would be the minimal amount of parameters for your fitting? If we decide to replace the current fitting with yours, it is easy to add parameters to the toolbar.
My implementation essentially exposes almost every magic constant in every algorithm as a parameter, so there are 30 or so. There are parameters that specify what kinds of primitives (arcs, lines, clothoids) and transitions are preferred, and the rest mostly tradeoff accuracy vs. simplicity and quality vs. performance.
For a real UI, therefore, I think that one or two sliders (the quality vs. performance slider is probably optional) and some buttons for choosing the curve type should be sufficient.
Thanks,
-Ilya
Ciao, Johan
Fulfilling the Lean Software Promise Lean software platforms are now widely adopted and the benefits have been demonstrated beyond question. Learn why your peers are replacing JEE containers with lightweight application servers - and what you can gain from the move. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfemails _______________________________________________ Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel