On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 19:21 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 16:42 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
- is not color management aware
- only support 8-bit data per color channel max
- only handles RGB(A) and greyscale images
That sounds like what we want.
Do you mean you intentionally want a less capable solution? If so, why?
I get the feeling your thinking of tiff and not jpeg. But this kind of output would be "unsupported output" in that it would be uncomplicated in it's implementation and serious work should still do something else.
I say this because I feel like some features are a matter for an elementary demographic and it's a level where the maintenance burden isn't /too/ high. Where as a serious internal professional implementation would take time and generate a lot of code we'd have to maintain.
It's one reason why I like extensions, libraries, pipelines and integrations with other tools... we get capabilities without much maintenance cost.
Best Regards, Martin Owens