On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 07:12:13PM -0400, Martin Owens wrote:
On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 21:40 +0100, Alex Valavanis wrote:
> As I understand it, the only reason why we maintain a fork of
> Adaptagrams is that there isn't an upstream release yet.
>
> Is anyone in touch with the upstream Adaptagrams dev (M Wybrow)? If
> we could persuade him to make a release tarball, perhaps we can get
> it adopted by some distros... and then finally drop our fork!
It's not necessary to have a cooperative upstream (though it is much
nicer) you can build the tarballs from a fork, publish them on github
and kick the distros into packaging mode.
That might be a good practice to adopt in general for situations like
this.
Bryce
I would have preferred we do it this way than bringing in the
adaptergrams code into our codebase. But I understand there are
complications with different platforms.
Best Regards, Martin Owens