Am Sonntag, 7. August 2011 schrub Johan Engelen:
On 7-8-2011 8:59, Krzysztof Kosiński wrote:
2011/8/7 Josh Andler<scislac@...400...>:
For Illustration, it's not really useful. For Technical drawing I see a usability win. I say yes to having it optional.
Here's a proposal:
- Grid snapping off: create on curve.
- Grid snapping on:
2a. Segment is Bezier: create on curve. 2b. Segment is line: snap to grid.
I could live with that.
Just wondering: what is the use case for adding a node with grid on, and not snapping it to the grid? Shape preserving is too weak an argument for me; in that case, why add a node at all? I presume you want to add a node to change the looks of the path! (either change slope, or move the node, in which case the node will snap to grid?)
I do that all the time to have one part of the path stay where it is and only change the other part. To do this I add a node, set it to be non-continuous and start editing the nodes on one side, which can use the grid.
Ciao, Johan
Tobias