2013/5/31 Martin Owens <doctormo@...400...>
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 11:01 -0300, Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira
> I didn't find, but the paper homepage
> ( http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/kopf/pixelart/
) has a
> bibtex reference sample and the key used to reference this paper is
Oh that, that's just the meta data id
I was hoping to convince you of the lack of elegance of the 'kopf2011'
string. It can't be pronounced (in English).
Isn't more important to use a name that uniquely identify the thing? We can
pronounce kopf the same way we pronounce http (letter by letter).
In the Inkscape interface, we can simply put the text "convert pixel art",
but in the program source code, there should be more detail.
I'm open to suggestions anyway.
Is there anything else we can use instead?
The last paper I've read name the technique in the paper title, but this
vectorization paper is very different. I've skimmed the paper one more time
and the references to the algorithm aren't named:
- "We describe a novel algorithm [...]"
- "Our algorithm extracts [...]"
- "We applied our algorithm [...]"
- "We have presented an algorithm [...]"
I'm coding aside from discussing the library. You guys don't need to worry
about the timeline or me spending time in this discussion.
Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira