![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/b47d036b8f12e712f4960ba78404c3b2.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
15 Jan
2009
15 Jan
'09
12:37 a.m.
Ted Gould wrote:
Oh, I thought you just wanted to rework the implementation class. No, what you're talking about is a bad idea. I can understand how you get that from looking at I/O, but the real intention there (thought I never did it) is to move all of src/file.cpp in to those two files. If you look at src/extension/effect.cpp I think you'll have a hard time adapting that into your new scheme without effectively making the same separation.
I looked there and I didn't see anything that would make my design awkward yet, but I'll investigate more and come up with an inheritance graph and some more detailed ideas. The only thing that may be problematic is interfacing with verbs - I don't know much about them yet.
Regards, Krzysztof Kosiński
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Extension-system-tp21448270p21468720.html
Sent from the Inkscape - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.