Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2017 um 17:10 Uhr Von: "Maren Hachmann" <maren@...3165...> An: inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: Re: [Inkscape-devel] Inkscape 0.92 review in German
Am 16.02.2017 um 15:50 schrieb Alexandre Prokoudine:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Maren Hachmann wrote:
For people who wish to have other raster export formats, there are extensions available which can be used to export to them. One option is currently jpg (https://github.com/giacmir/Inkscape-JPEG-export-extension), and I've worked on a webp export being added to it (but couldn't find a tester).
If you have your code in a public space, announcing a call for testers can be easily organized.
- Thank you, Alex :)
It's here: https://github.com/giacmir/Inkscape-JPEG-export-extension/pull/12
It would really only need one tester on Windows (who can also help debug the new imagemagick naming issue - which would need to be fixed first), one on Linux with a current, correctly compiled imagemagick version, and maybe someone on a Mac (but I don't know if it works there at all).
The other issue is that the imagemagick version that is needed isn't available for Ubuntu etc. without compiling with a flag for enabling webp, because the packager finds that the feature is too 'new' (maybe they're right, don't know). Installing webp doesn't help for me. I just searched for updates on this issue, and while it seemed it's enabled now according to some posts, I just 'broke' my own version when upgrading...
Regards, Maren
Why create such an unnecessary dependy? Isn't libjpeg good enough? Also, for print-related export, the TIFF format is much more common, and there's libtiff waiting to be used ...
Christoph