On 21/04/06, jiho <jo.irisson@...400...> wrote:
On 21 Apr 2006, at 10:59 , Ben Fowler wrote:
[ snip ]
What surprises me now it that my fink packages were supposed to be build with gcc 4: ... So in fact I this is indeed a compiler version problem, ... ... it seems that the new non-transitional tree for 10.4 is up now (thought I cannot see any announcement on Fink's website).
These are very sound points. It is possible that the fink project (which may be rather undermanned) is concentrating on a switch to Mac Intel and the website may be out of date.
I'll just reinstall fink, do a fresh svn checkout, update the wiki page with some clues on how to determine which version of gcc is used in fink ...
That should do the trick. It seems that Inkscape devs have been amongst the most affected, I think because it is the combination of compiling our own code and linking to fink's gnome libraries. (Most people are linking other fink packages, and only have to be self-consistent). It is a pity that we don't seem to have anyone who is on the fink team also on this list as it would seem to me that a degree of cross pollination would be beneficial here.
I am far from certain, but I think that if you do have a complete re-install of fink, using the final 10.4 tree then you will be able to use gcc-4 (but maybe only fink's gcc). I am not compiling inkscape as often as I would like, but I mainly use Panther.
Do we want a Universal Binary for 0.44? My guess is that we do.
Ben