--- bulia byak <buliabyak@...400...> wrote:
On 6/3/06, Ben Fowler <ben.the.mole@...400...> wrote:
FWIW, I suspect that we may have to ask the parties who hold strong views, such as Alan, the Drivers such as Bulia and the Translators
to
give us pros and cons for two basic alternatives:
A. We agree that the present name "Effects" is wrong, but
delivering
Effects "On" in version 0.44 is so important that we will use this name (perhaps merely as a placeholder) and fix the UI in the next release.
B. We agree that a coherent UI is so important that we will leave Effects "Off" in version 0.44 and turn them on by default when the
UI
is fit for public use.
No wonder this thread grew to 20+ messages. Is no one listening to what I'm saying?
For me it's neither A nor B, but C: leave "Effects" alone forever. It's perfectly logical and in place. Any arguments for "Effect" I've heard so far were very unconvincing.
And even if I agreed to the name change, of course disabling effects for the release because of this is simply out of the question.
Can we please drop this subject?
Couldnt agree more, I still dont believe theres anything wrong with what we have. I agree we need to add the _ when we do 0.44.1, but the idea that we disable something as positive for the users as effects because of something so minor is just daft.
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com