2013/5/31 Kris De Gussem <kris.degussem@...400...>
>Nobody seems to disapprove this idea, then I'll license it
under LGPL, so
other open source projects which use other licenses different than GPL
might benefit from it.
Hmm, we've got different emails then? ;-)
I thought it was already said that unless it is really necessary, you
should use another license than the license the project uses. So please
stick to GPL. Our license situation is already difficult enough.
Thanks.
I'm sorry. Dual-license then.
--
Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira
https://about.me/vinipsmaker