![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/650e8f686572eb00b7b445fe657f222a.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
2008/10/27 bulia byak <buliabyak@...400...>
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Bryce Harrington <bryce@...1798...> wrote:
Every assertion you make in this last paragraph can be debated. However, using the inflammatory term "abuse" in reference to our current processes makes it sound like you're just trolling anyway.
I honestly do not see any trolling here. It's a valid concern. I personally do not care much about how we mark bugs, so long as it's consistent, but I do understand how our current system may look slightly weird. I think everyone who cares about this part of the project should make an effort to discuss it in a civil and productive manner.
Agreed, I also think the way launchpad tags stuff doesnt fit particularly well with the way we do our process, but understand how we do it. I personally still dont like that RFEs are bugs with an importance of wishlist. If your going to leave them as bugs then wishlist should be a status, not an importance, as you then rule out being able to rank RFEs, which kinda sucks.