On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Martin Owens <doctormo@...400...> wrote:
I'm super focused on replacing 0.48 with 0.49 and a point release feels too much like a surrender. But I can also see getting fixes into that version. On balance I will take no action and trust my esteemed colleges to make the call and commit.
Focusing on 0.49 is good. However, we definitely need another stable point release as we had introduced regressions in the 0.48.x line and for the other reasons Alex had mentioned. One thing to be aware of, once we push out a 0.49 release, chances are we're going to get a good number of regressions reported that we missed. Knowing that, people will need a solid stable release to fall back to while we tackle those new bugs.
Cheers, Josh