On 05/31/2013 04:33 AM, Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira wrote:
What do you guys think about use a more permissive license (LGPLv2.1
and
later, MIT, ...) for the library?
If you are writing this from scratch and
seperating this into an isolated library,
you could just dual-license it with a GPL variant and some sort of commercial license.
I do not like the idea of giving away work for commercial exploitation for free.
Regards, Sebastian