
26 Apr
2006
26 Apr
'06
5:46 p.m.
MenTaLguY wrote:
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:16:15 -0500, Aaron Spike <aaron@...749...> wrote:
I hadn't thought about using one effect multiple times, but we will probably desire that someday.
I believe it's better to think of this in terms of instances of an effect.
i.e. you're not attaching path effects to paths, but instances of them.
Indeed, that is exactly how I was thinking of it. Please keep catching my terminology until I start speaking correctly. :-)
(I was waiting for you to correct my omission of the namespace prefix on my example too. Luckily I got a chance to correct myself first.)
Aaron Spike