On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 11:43 -0500, MenTaLguY wrote:
On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 00:18 -0600, Bob Jamison wrote:
I guess that it is still in progress, because a checkout failed mid-stream. However, it looks like the URL for the entire repository is: https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/inkscape
But likely people will not want or need the whole thing. The inkscape directory in particular is: https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/inkscape/trunk/inkscape
I'm wondering whether we should give each module its own trunk and branches. I did that for the The Ruby Grammar Project, but I'm still not sure whether that's a good idea.
I think that's a better idea. It keeps everything more separated and clearer IMHO. Especially with tagging releases. Consider:
https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/inkscape/tags/inkscape-0.44 https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/inkscape/tags/inkscape_web-0.1
vs.
https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/inkscape/inkscape/tags/0.44 https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/inkscape/inkscape_web/tags/0.1
Not that you'd want to tag inkscape_web but you get the idea.
Jon