MenTaLguY wrote, On 01/09/09 08:16:
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 19:22 +0100, Thomas Holder wrote:
> Thomas Holder wrote, On 01/08/09 14:35:
>> as an alternative, we could do the same like with SVG files.
>> There is a "promote_to_svg_namespace" function in
>> xml/repr-io.cpp, so SVG files work fine with and without xmlns
>> attribute.
> patch applied that promotes the default namespace to all read XML
> files, not just SVG. What do you think about it? Still nasty?
Yes, it's nasty! I'm not necessarily against promotion for specific
sorts of XML files, but please don't do this unconditionally for all
XML files!
for sure it's not my goal to introduce nasty code. I just tried to give
some suggestions how to solve the extension namespace issue.
Thomas