4 Apr
2004
4 Apr
'04
4:44 p.m.
MenTaLguY wrote:
Well, almost. There are actually quite a few bits of required information to be compliant EPS; I don't think we supply them all yet.
I forget the name of the relevent specification though. :/
Obviously what we have is already fairly servicable though.
-mental
But I think (I might be wrong) that all of the necessary data to wrap PS into EPS is supplied as comments, so it might not be necessary to break the current code.