Hi Krzysztof,
On 08/09/2011 08:30 AM, Krzysztof Kosiński wrote:
W dniu 7 sierpnia 2011 23:34 użytkownik Diederik van Lierop <mail@...1689...> napisał:
That would be a mess! There are simply to much possible snap sources and snap targets to give them all an individual toggle. Besides, we do not enable snapping bounding boxes to paths and vice-versa, see [1] for an explanation. This is what's being communicated by dividing the snap toggles in three groups. Although I agree that the snapping toggles could be more intuitive, I don't know of an easy solution that would fit all.
I'm not advocating snapping between bboxes and nodes, but I think that when you turn on the snap toggle for smooth nodes, they should both snap and be snapped to.
My latest few commits might please you. Please try the new snap behavior and give me some feedback.
Thanks,
Diederik