On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 22:49 +1000, Void wrote:
This is a courtesy email to let you guys know what has happened with "Inkscape Lite". Awhile back I received some help from this mail-list, to choose an appropriate version of Inkscape for use in Puppy Linux.
Great. I'm glad you were able to find an Inkscape that'll work. But, it'd be nice if we can figure out how to use a more current version.
The binary tarball for InkscapeLite is to be found at Ibiblio: http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/puppylinux/pupget_packages...
The source tarball is at: http://puptrix.org/sources/
Should we put this in to a SVN branch? What are people thinking about this?
We also have binary tarballs for the full Inkscape, v0.43 and it is interesting to compare sizes:
Binary pkg Executable share/inkscape v0.43 shared gtkmm 3807K 1932K v0.43 static gtkmm 5619K 1932K v0.36.2 "InkLite" 1042K 928K
...interesting! Of course, the executables are all stripped.
This is a bit surprising to me. What do other people think? It seems that when Bryce was doing his status reports the number of LOC was reducing over time, or atleast not moving towards 4x the number. I realize that 0.43 includes things like Potrace... but almost 4x?
--Ted