On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 00:34 -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, Jon Phillips wrote:
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 16:23 -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, MenTaLguY wrote: Btw, is there an early version of the SVG spec that we support 100%?
We talked before about SVG Tiny which is a subset of SVG 1.1: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile/
We don't fully support this though yet...mainly because of lack of support for the switch statement declaring multiple profiles.
What do you think if we set a goal for 0.42 or 0.43 to fully support 100% of SVG Tiny? That'd be a nice feather in the cap to be able to declare full compliance to one of the SVG specs.
I think sounds like a brilliant idea for 0.42 (a more stable release). Maybe that could be a SVG Tiny + bugfix release.
With the strength of our developers, I think more general goals such as SVG Tiny Compliance are good. After we have compliance with SVG Tiny, I think we will be positioned to aid many new developers for SVG Tiny development on cellphones.
ROCK!
Jon