On 10/16/05, jiho <jo.irisson@...400...> wrote:

On 15 oct. 05, at 20:23, Ben Fowler wrote:

...

On 10/15/05, jiho <jo.irisson@...400...> wrote:

...

On 15 oct. 05, at 18:34, Ben Fowler wrote:

...

On 10/15/05, bulia byak <buliabyak@...400...> wrote:

...

On 10/15/05, Ben Fowler <ben.the.mole@...400...> wrote:

• that some criteria are chosen in the sanity check and some fixes

are proposed when these criteria are met. As I mentioned before, I am thinking about scaling objects that have insane bbox or that are really big/small in comparison with the rest of the drawing. Or even scaling the whole drawing if it is huge (as it was the case previously with somebody who couldn't zoom out far enough to see the whole drawing if I remember well) or tiny (as it is the case with the other file I have). And having the possibility to accept or reject any change individually make this feature not too intrusive. Once again I don't know if all this even means something. Just correct me if this is stupid.

If it is necessary to 'fix up' objects individually, then you might want to select them one at a time and check the appearance and/or the properties.

Ben