What are our minimum versions currently?
Our requirements say
gdkmm-2.4 glibmm-2.4 gtkmm-2.4 gtk+-2.0 >= 2.8.0
First I was thinking that the *mm ones should match the GTK+ requirement.
Second, I was wondering when we're moving up past 2.8.x?
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 04:33:47PM -0700, Jon A. Cruz wrote:
What are our minimum versions currently?
Our requirements say
gdkmm-2.4 glibmm-2.4 gtkmm-2.4 gtk+-2.0 >= 2.8.0
First I was thinking that the *mm ones should match the GTK+ requirement.
Yeah, they should.
Second, I was wondering when we're moving up past 2.8.x?
The plan was Gtk 2.8 for 0.45, and 2.10 for 0.46. So probably would be worthwhile to go ahead and jump to Gtk 2.10 now.
Bryce
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 04:33:47PM -0700, Jon A. Cruz wrote:
What are our minimum versions currently?
Our requirements say
gdkmm-2.4 glibmm-2.4 gtkmm-2.4 gtk+-2.0 >= 2.8.0
I think that since gtk+-2.0 is the common ancestor, this is sufficient, and means we only need to change the version in one place. :)
On Apr 15, 2007, at 4:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 04:33:47PM -0700, Jon A. Cruz wrote:
What are our minimum versions currently?
Our requirements say
gdkmm-2.4 glibmm-2.4 gtkmm-2.4 gtk+-2.0 >= 2.8.0
I think that since gtk+-2.0 is the common ancestor, this is sufficient, and means we only need to change the version in one place. :)
Well... we have had people come onto Jabber who are having problems and who happen to have built inkscape with GTK+ 2.8 installed and gtkmm 2.4 also installed.
participants (3)
-
Bryce Harrington -
Jon A. Cruz -
Kees Cook