revision number in about screen
Hi I'm using devel versions from PPA for trunk and I noticed that the about screen doesn't show the revision number (it just shows "0.48+devel r"). It showed the revision number in previous versions, so I assume something broke there (I can't tell when, but at least in the last two trunk builds from PPA)
Gez.
I removed the Ubuntu patches from the PPA build recipe, as I thought it better to use a "pure" trunk build. In the process, I removed the following: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~cafuego/inkscape/debian-build/view/head:/patche...
I'll have a look at it later. Does anyone have any thoughts about the patch?
AV
On 27 June 2011 06:53, gespertino@...400... <gespertino@...400...> wrote:
Hi I'm using devel versions from PPA for trunk and I noticed that the about screen doesn't show the revision number (it just shows "0.48+devel r"). It showed the revision number in previous versions, so I assume something broke there (I can't tell when, but at least in the last two trunk builds from PPA)
Gez.
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
Since bug #804162 makes work with trunk impossible for me I re-installed inkscape from repositories. I noticed that inkscape-trunk from PPA seems to conflict with inkscape from repos, so trunk has to be removed in order to reinstall stable. My intention is keep testing trunk, but there are a couple of bugs that keep me from using that version for work, so I need stable.
Is it possible to make both versions co-exist?
cheers, Gez.
2011/6/27 Alex Valavanis <valavanisalex@...400...>:
I removed the Ubuntu patches from the PPA build recipe, as I thought it better to use a "pure" trunk build. In the process, I removed the following: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~cafuego/inkscape/debian-build/view/head:/patche...
I'll have a look at it later. Does anyone have any thoughts about the patch?
The build environment in PPA does not have Bazaar, so the patch uses the package changelog to determine the Bazaar version. I think it's OK to use it.
Regards, Krzysztof
The trouble here is that I have changed the Debian source format to "native" rather than "quilt", which indicates that the package is provided by the upstream developers rather than by a linux distribution. I'm not sure how well the quilt patch system will cope if I try to use it in a native package. I'll have a play with it and see.
AV
2011/7/6 Krzysztof Kosiński <tweenk.pl@...400...>:
2011/6/27 Alex Valavanis <valavanisalex@...400...>:
I removed the Ubuntu patches from the PPA build recipe, as I thought it better to use a "pure" trunk build. In the process, I removed the following: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~cafuego/inkscape/debian-build/view/head:/patche...
I'll have a look at it later. Does anyone have any thoughts about the patch?
The build environment in PPA does not have Bazaar, so the patch uses the package changelog to determine the Bazaar version. I think it's OK to use it.
Regards, Krzysztof
W dniu 19 lipca 2011 18:20 użytkownik Alex Valavanis <valavanisalex@...400...> napisał:
The trouble here is that I have changed the Debian source format to "native" rather than "quilt", which indicates that the package is provided by the upstream developers rather than by a linux distribution. I'm not sure how well the quilt patch system will cope if I try to use it in a native package. I'll have a play with it and see.
You could try adding some extra ifs to check whether the Bazaar client exists.
Regards, Krzysztof
participants (3)
-
Alex Valavanis
-
gespertino@...400...
-
Krzysztof Kosiński