Le Wednesday 26 September 2007 02:41:24 Alexandre Prokoudine, vous avez
écrit :
On 9/26/07, Colin Marquardt wrote:
> > Also, why do we use lang="en" attribute everywhere in
> > inkscapeUTFen.xml?
>
> Probably for hysterical raisins, since it used to be a single file
> with both French and English in it.
OK, removed and committed to SVN. Also fixed header in French user
guide which was set to article instead of book (as pointed out by
Elisa).
> > Colin, I think we need a simple Makefile to create HTML version (at
> > least HTML).
>
> Just take the Makefile that is in there since a few weeks :)
>
> The targets are fr, en, singlefr, singleen. It also has PDF targets
> etc., do "make help" in user_manual/.
Arrr, silly me :)
OK, here is XML file I have right now (attached). All chapters are
splitted to separate documents. It's already easier to see what needs
work :)
Basically the root document now contains links to separate chapters,
so every contributor can work on his own part (chapter). We can create
even smaller documents, but I don't think it's that necessarily.
If you are fine with this approach, I can commit changes, BUT :)
IMO, from what I see, the user guide needs restructuring (chapters on
various menus should not be top-level chapters etc.). We can go one of
two paths:
1. Wait until EN and FR user guides are in sync and then
restructure/separate.
2. Agree on new outline of the document, separate
chapters and then sync their content.
What about this contents :
Présentation d'inkscape (introduce Inkscape)
La boîte à outils (the tools)
Les dialogues (??? "pop-up" ?, like the windows to choose the color etc)
le menu Chemin (paths)
le menu Effets (effects)
les raccourcis claviers ("keyboard map" ?)
Ok it look like very simple but the chapter will be developed.
If we separate documents, we will need to store each translation (EN
and FR) in its own directory. So the directories structure will look
this way:
user_manual/xml/en/{english xml files here}
user_manual/xml/fr/{french xml files here}
By the way, XML markup will need some work too. Generally, using
simplesect inside sect1 is considered... well... not a usual way to
structure documents :)
ah... i think the tag was original by Kevin. Then we can choose some better.
Please comment ;-)
Alexandre
--
Elisa