Le 21/02/2016 22:09, Brynn a écrit :
Oh no, I didn't see anything malicious either. But isn't
this supposed to
be a gallery for Inkscape images?
If any image is ok, as long as it's not malicious or advertising or nudity,
won't the gallery eventually lose its focus (along with its audience)?
(That cardboard castle image still annoys me. It's less about Inkscape than
this one! If this one actually has any connection.)
Perhaps I'm missing something about this? But especially with space
apparently coming at a premium (BG 4 times in the last hour), won't the
gallery and website be better off without random non-Inkscape images?
brynn
I agree with you, Brynn; I think that those pictures are misplaced and
the reaction of our admistrators is also strange to me… Maybe they are
malicious? Oh no! :P
Sylvain
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Martin Owens" <doctormo@...2...>
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 5:31 AM
To: "Brynn" <brynn@...78...>
Cc: "Inkscape-Docs" <inkscape-docs(a)lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Inkscape-docs] non-Inkscape image in gallery
> Each user gets 10MB, there's nothing malicious I can see here (yet). I
> guess we'll just wait and see if this user does anything wrong.
>
> Martin,
>
> On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 04:29 -0700, Brynn wrote:
>> Hi Friends (website team),
>> I'm reporting images here, until the report system allows for
>> the
>> reporter to add comments. (Maybe I should make a feature request for
>> that?)
>>
https://inkscape.org/en/~UptownKas/%E2%98%85kas
>> The member may well have created the logo in Inkscape, but
>> it's a
>> photo of (probably) his kids (or her kids?). It could be perfectly
>> innocent
>> misunderstanding. But could also just be advertising....although
>> they
>> didn't make any outside links. Should they be contacted?
>> Remind me how much space a regular member gets?