Oh no, I didn't see anything malicious either. But isn't this supposed to be a gallery for Inkscape images?
If any image is ok, as long as it's not malicious or advertising or nudity, won't the gallery eventually lose its focus (along with its audience)? (That cardboard castle image still annoys me. It's less about Inkscape than this one! If this one actually has any connection.)
Perhaps I'm missing something about this? But especially with space apparently coming at a premium (BG 4 times in the last hour), won't the gallery and website be better off without random non-Inkscape images?
brynn
-------------------------------------------------- From: "Martin Owens" <doctormo@...2...> Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 5:31 AM To: "Brynn" <brynn@...78...> Cc: "Inkscape-Docs" inkscape-docs@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Inkscape-docs] non-Inkscape image in gallery
Each user gets 10MB, there's nothing malicious I can see here (yet). I guess we'll just wait and see if this user does anything wrong.
Martin,
On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 04:29 -0700, Brynn wrote:
Hi Friends (website team), I'm reporting images here, until the report system allows for the reporter to add comments. (Maybe I should make a feature request for that?) https://inkscape.org/en/~UptownKas/%E2%98%85kas The member may well have created the logo in Inkscape, but it's a photo of (probably) his kids (or her kids?). It could be perfectly innocent misunderstanding. But could also just be advertising....although they didn't make any outside links. Should they be contacted? Remind me how much space a regular member gets?