Hi Friends (website team), I'm reporting images here, until the report system allows for the reporter to add comments. (Maybe I should make a feature request for that?) https://inkscape.org/en/~UptownKas/%E2%98%85kas The member may well have created the logo in Inkscape, but it's a photo of (probably) his kids (or her kids?). It could be perfectly innocent misunderstanding. But could also just be advertising....although they didn't make any outside links. Should they be contacted? Remind me how much space a regular member gets?
Thanks, brynn
Each user gets 10MB, there's nothing malicious I can see here (yet). I guess we'll just wait and see if this user does anything wrong.
Martin,
On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 04:29 -0700, Brynn wrote:
Hi Friends (website team), I'm reporting images here, until the report system allows for the reporter to add comments. (Maybe I should make a feature request for that?) https://inkscape.org/en/~UptownKas/%E2%98%85kas The member may well have created the logo in Inkscape, but it's a photo of (probably) his kids (or her kids?). It could be perfectly innocent misunderstanding. But could also just be advertising....although they didn't make any outside links. Should they be contacted? Remind me how much space a regular member gets?
Am 21.02.2016 um 13:31 schrieb Martin Owens:
Each user gets 10MB, there's nothing malicious I can see here (yet). I guess we'll just wait and see if this user does anything wrong.
The 10 Mb seem to currently be not checked (at least not for me). Also see https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape-web/+bug/1542910
Martin,
On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 04:29 -0700, Brynn wrote:
Hi Friends (website team), I'm reporting images here, until the report system allows for the reporter to add comments. (Maybe I should make a feature request for that?) https://inkscape.org/en/~UptownKas/%E2%98%85kas The member may well have created the logo in Inkscape, but it's a photo of (probably) his kids (or her kids?). It could be perfectly innocent misunderstanding. But could also just be advertising....although they didn't make any outside links. Should they be contacted? Remind me how much space a regular member gets?
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Inkscape-docs mailing list Inkscape-docs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-docs
Oh no, I didn't see anything malicious either. But isn't this supposed to be a gallery for Inkscape images?
If any image is ok, as long as it's not malicious or advertising or nudity, won't the gallery eventually lose its focus (along with its audience)? (That cardboard castle image still annoys me. It's less about Inkscape than this one! If this one actually has any connection.)
Perhaps I'm missing something about this? But especially with space apparently coming at a premium (BG 4 times in the last hour), won't the gallery and website be better off without random non-Inkscape images?
brynn
-------------------------------------------------- From: "Martin Owens" <doctormo@...2...> Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 5:31 AM To: "Brynn" <brynn@...78...> Cc: "Inkscape-Docs" inkscape-docs@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Inkscape-docs] non-Inkscape image in gallery
Each user gets 10MB, there's nothing malicious I can see here (yet). I guess we'll just wait and see if this user does anything wrong.
Martin,
On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 04:29 -0700, Brynn wrote:
Hi Friends (website team), I'm reporting images here, until the report system allows for the reporter to add comments. (Maybe I should make a feature request for that?) https://inkscape.org/en/~UptownKas/%E2%98%85kas The member may well have created the logo in Inkscape, but it's a photo of (probably) his kids (or her kids?). It could be perfectly innocent misunderstanding. But could also just be advertising....although they didn't make any outside links. Should they be contacted? Remind me how much space a regular member gets?
Le 21/02/2016 22:09, Brynn a écrit :
Oh no, I didn't see anything malicious either. But isn't this supposed to be a gallery for Inkscape images?
If any image is ok, as long as it's not malicious or advertising or nudity, won't the gallery eventually lose its focus (along with its audience)? (That cardboard castle image still annoys me. It's less about Inkscape than this one! If this one actually has any connection.)
Perhaps I'm missing something about this? But especially with space apparently coming at a premium (BG 4 times in the last hour), won't the gallery and website be better off without random non-Inkscape images?
brynn
I agree with you, Brynn; I think that those pictures are misplaced and the reaction of our admistrators is also strange to me… Maybe they are malicious? Oh no! :P
Sylvain
From: "Martin Owens" <doctormo@...2...> Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 5:31 AM To: "Brynn" <brynn@...78...> Cc: "Inkscape-Docs" inkscape-docs@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Inkscape-docs] non-Inkscape image in gallery
Each user gets 10MB, there's nothing malicious I can see here (yet). I guess we'll just wait and see if this user does anything wrong.
Martin,
On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 04:29 -0700, Brynn wrote:
Hi Friends (website team), I'm reporting images here, until the report system allows for the reporter to add comments. (Maybe I should make a feature request for that?) https://inkscape.org/en/~UptownKas/%E2%98%85kas The member may well have created the logo in Inkscape, but it's a photo of (probably) his kids (or her kids?). It could be perfectly innocent misunderstanding. But could also just be advertising....although they didn't make any outside links. Should they be contacted? Remind me how much space a regular member gets?
On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 14:09 -0700, Brynn wrote:
Oh no, I didn't see anything malicious either. But isn't this supposed to be a gallery for Inkscape images?
If any image is ok, as long as it's not malicious or advertising or nudity, won't the gallery eventually lose its focus (along with its audience)? (That cardboard castle image still annoys me. It's less about Inkscape than this one! If this one actually has any connection.)
Perhaps I'm missing something about this? But especially with space apparently coming at a premium (BG 4 times in the last hour), won't the gallery and website be better off without random non-Inkscape images?
We have no official policy on non-inkscape images. Part of the reason for having such a low quota (when it works) is to not have to mind so much about random images that aren't actually offensive. It's an attempt to reduce our workloads if you will.
Martin,
My offer to moderate (that I made some months ago) still stands :-)
brynn
-------------------------------------------------- From: "Martin Owens" <doctormo@...2...> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 8:08 AM To: "Brynn" <brynn@...78...> Cc: "Inkscape-Docs" inkscape-docs@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Inkscape-docs] non-Inkscape image in gallery
On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 14:09 -0700, Brynn wrote:
Oh no, I didn't see anything malicious either. But isn't this supposed to be a gallery for Inkscape images?
If any image is ok, as long as it's not malicious or advertising or nudity, won't the gallery eventually lose its focus (along with its audience)? (That cardboard castle image still annoys me. It's less about Inkscape than this one! If this one actually has any connection.)
Perhaps I'm missing something about this? But especially with space apparently coming at a premium (BG 4 times in the last hour), won't the gallery and website be better off without random non-Inkscape images?
We have no official policy on non-inkscape images. Part of the reason for having such a low quota (when it works) is to not have to mind so much about random images that aren't actually offensive. It's an attempt to reduce our workloads if you will.
Martin,
On Tue, 2016-02-23 at 04:41 -0700, Brynn wrote:
My offer to moderate (that I made some months ago) still stands :-)
Hi Brynn,
Your moderator privileges would be based on the mechanisms we have in the website. If that makes sense.
I'll get back to you soon because I want to test it properly before throwing you into the mix.
Thanks for your help.
Best Regards, Martin Owens
participants (4)
-
Brynn -
Maren Hachmann -
Martin Owens -
Sylvain Chiron