Maarten van der Velde wrote:
Has anybody actually looked at picture you provided in the first mail, Mr. Shawn h. Corey? ***I did*** and it renders in your browser COMPLETELY DIFFERENT as in mine. (Completely f&^%-up, actually) In your browser, it is indeed ugly because all kind of elements get completely displaced. I think the confusing arising from this might explain the grim tone this discussion is getting. Please, everybody, have a look at the PNG that was attached the first time.
Yes, I looked at it and noticed a bug I also reported earlier. But ugly is not the same thing as buggy. Looking at that screenshot I can easily say it does not display as intended.
One can say the site is ugly if he talk about the colors, the layout, buttons and graphics.