On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 09:10, Jasper van de Gronde wrote:
Andrew S. Townley wrote:
... (http://atownley.org/wip/grid-snap-example.jpg). I've positioned
the
set on the right as accurately as I could using the x, y, w & h parameters. On the left, this was as close as I could get them to
snap
with the default settings. ...
It might snap the bounding box of the line instead of the nodes of the line. So try to set on snapping of points and position the nodes using the node editor.
(BTW, in any case, the x, y, w and h values take the stroke of the
line
into account.)
I'll give that a shot and see. When I was doing the actual drawing, I experimented with a bunch of variations of the snap options, so I really don't know which combinations I tried. I do know that my experience was when I could get the boxes to touch, the snap wasn't absolute and I ended up with stacks of 64x64 not being the same height as a single 64x192 rectangle. That's when I started doing the offsets manually with the text boxes.
Mostly, I'm just trying to see if this behavior has been noticed by anyone else. If necessary, I can try and put together a reproduceable test case and enter a bug.
Thanks for your help,
ast