On 21-06-11 18:54, A. da Mek wrote:
...
(BTW, the the length of the path data would be better minimized were the coordinates smartly rounded instead of such values as -113.000006 or -12.99999)
Especially the -113.000006 has me worried a bit, is it from an actual path?
This was done on the 0.47. Now I downloaded 0.48+devel r10300 (from 14-Jun-2011) made a new svg file and copied into it the abovementioned path.
If I drag it with the mouse, the result is for example ... But then I reread the original message and realised that the author probably meant moving with the arrow keys, which gives results well rounded and I can now see how the relative and absolute coordinates change at different positions. ...
I had a look at the paths you quoted, and I think they're probably "correct", but perhaps we should at one point revisit how we handle dragging with the mouse (and/or zooming). It might make sense to "snap" to more logical values while dragging and/or constraining zoom levels so that the coordinates don't get too weird.