Lars Boelman wrote:
My impression of the Inkscape interface is that there's no real common sense about how to create the interface among the developers. I hope I'm wrong about this and that there are guidelines for developing for the Inkscape interface. There are several HIGs (Human Interface Guidelines) available for free on the web, who basically tell the same. I'm a real fan of the Mac OS X Aqua desktop environment and think that the Apple HIG are argumented very well. I'd suggest that at least some parts of the Apple and Gnome HIGs should be used as guidelines for developing the Inkscape interface and should be referred to (at least the useful parts of) at the software development documentation. This only is useful when all developers see the relevance of this and consistently apply it.
Well, to let you know, there is a common sense about how to create the interface. However, the main issue is to first get the structure internally fixed, then later hang the skin on it. Much like if we were making a car, first we're getting the transmition, frame, suspension, etc. all done. Then we'll go and build on the chassis later. Carrying this analogy a little further, once we have the good parts working well, we can bolt on the VW Bug chassis instead of the current Golf chassis. :-)
And the developers are aware of the different HIG documents out there. Also some of us do follow UI design (I myself think that Tog has missed the boat on some key things, and is not quite "all that"). :-)
Those HIGs, plus some others, are definitely considered as the developers move forward. I think that one of the main issues is that internal cleanup is going on first. Then after that more user visible changes will start to pop up all over.
Ooooh... and if you check the developer roadmap over on the wiki, http://www.inkscape.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Roadmap you'll see that HIG starts to get mentioned for 0.41. So it looks like good time for users to start paying more attention to the UI.