So it looks like
Thursday, July 8, 2021 - 14:00 Thursday, July 8, 2021 - 15:00 Thursday, July 8, 2021 - 16:00 Thursday, July 8, 2021 - 20:00
(UTC)
Are the best times.
Ted & Josh?
Martin,
On Sun, 2021-07-04 at 16:02 +0100, C R wrote:
I've updated my vote to include Thursday. I may not be 100% better by then, but at least Doc will be able to join us. :) -C
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 5:29 PM C R cajhne@gmail.com wrote:
I've added my times. I get my 2nd vax shot on Tuesday, and I expect to be ill for the following days like I was for the last one, so Friday works best for me. Thanks for setting this up, Pono! -C
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 4:34 PM Daniel Pono Takamori < pono@sfconservancy.org> wrote:
Here's the poll in UTC: https://framadate.org/xBJg27wbjSoOlzUk Hopefully Tuesday-Friday next week works for people.
Thanks!
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 02:27:04PM -0400, Martin Owens wrote:
Hi Pono,
It looks like Marc isn't available at the moment, so we'll have
to
proceed without his input/dates. And it looks like we've run
through
the time poll we already did.
Could you set up a new poll and we'll put together a date for
our
meeting?
Thanks and sorry for the delays.
Best Regards, Martin Owens
On Mon, 2021-06-21 at 12:59 -0700, Daniel Pono Takamori wrote:
The poll is UTC, sorry for not specifying.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 03:13:50PM -0400, doctormo@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks Pono,
I was hoping to have Marc be able to speak up before we
started
planning times, but this works as it'll give us a sense for
when
people will be available to meet.
I've filled it out with the assumption these times are in
EST, let
me know if it's UTC or some other timezone.
The goal of the request is actually to ask for the SFC's
advice for
conducting meetings, to onboard/train committee members on
how to
conduct them. Because the Inkscape project hasn't been
conducting
actual meetings, it's been doing "status updates" (horribly mislabeled everywhere) so every time committee members tried to add
agenda
items to discuss serious business, they would be removed as not appropriate for the type of status update process that event for
intended for.
Now that we know that this monthly event isn't an actual
committee
meeting. We have an opportunity to create a real, fully
developed
meeting. With a discussion agenda, voting, minutes and all
the
parts of a meeting that many in the project really want (and thought
we had,
until it turned out we didn't) and your help setting that
up would
be great.
There is a dependency chain of administrative items that we
need to
work through before we get to funding though, and I don't
want us
to start on further items until we've fixed the first items:
- Meetings - holding actual meetings, so people have an
opportunity to talk about the administration of the project and the
community
has a space to bring items. 2. Constituency - We have no idea who is in the inkscape community. And this is devastating to our ability to act
authoritatively as
EVERYTHING is stalled waiting for the mythical "inkscape
community"
to agree to things. But because we don't have a handle who
this
community is, we have no idea if we have a quorum in any particular
meeting
or team, or if we're reaching people. We need meetings to have
the
practical space to work out how this will work. SFC's
guidance will
be critical here. 3. Discuss and request a change of definition of the
"Inkscape
Community" with the SFC (update to the Agreement text) to
allow...
- Voting on a replacement member - We're currently one
short, for
6 months we've been unable to hold a vote because we have no
idea who
to send ballots to. 5. Then we can start sending information to everyone about important discussions for funding. Hopefully everyone in the Inkscape community will get a chance to be involved in this discussions and
the
inkscape Committee can act as gentle stewards allowing the community
to work
through items in confidence with our new regular meetings
acting as
the backbone (and contextual location) for the discussions.
You can see that we have quite the list of items to work
through.
I believe there may be some confusion in the discussion
about this
being a change in the way the Inkscape Committee acts as a leadership. Or about funding. This request is not about funding, or
about how
"the project" makes decisions. It's just about how the committee conducts it's business and plugs back into the inkscape community so
we can
start being effective again.
Best Regards, Martin Owens
On Mon, 2021-06-21 at 11:19 -0700, Daniel Pono Takamori
wrote:
> Here's a poll for time gathering: > https://framadate.org/UsFcEuWf2duojI4o > > And here's a pad I made with a preliminary agenda: > https://pad.sfconservancy.org/p/Jg-a7AGFdHHpMVpICGf0 > > There was some talk in the other thread about video/voice
or IRC.
> I > don't have > any opinion and want to make the meeting accessible to
all who
> need/want to > attend, so let me know if I should setup a video call
link.
> > -Pono > _______________________________________________ Inkscape Board of Directors mailing list -- inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org To unsubscribe send an email to inkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.org
Inkscape Board of Directors mailing list -- inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org To unsubscribe send an email to inkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.org
Inkscape Board of Directors mailing list --
inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
inkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.org _______________________________________________ Inkscape Board of Directors mailing list -- inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org To unsubscribe send an email to inkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.org
Inkscape Board of Directors mailing list -- inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org To unsubscribe send an email to inkscape-board-leave@lists.inkscape.org