4:08 a.m.
Hi,
I finally got around to doing a review of the code of conduct as I
agreed to do at the last IRC board meeting. I apologize for taking so
long. I think the text looks great! I also think it might be time to
remove the "draft" stuff (Work in Progress at top, copies of other code
of conducts at bottom.)
I made some minor editing changes:
* "Even if" -> "For example, if" (avoid awkward repeating of
"even")
* "are conflicted" -> "have a conflict of interest"
* "feeling" -> "feel"
* "parent organization" -> "collaborating organizations" (We
don't
really have a parent organization and the text should apply, for
example, to our internet hosts.)
Tav
5:19 a.m.
Thanks Tav,
I've edited it up and we'll start considering this a non-draft live
document from now.
https://inkscape.org/en/community/coc/
Changes can still be made, but we're basicalyl done with this task.
Thanks everyone!
Best Regards, Martin Owens
On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 13:08 +0100, Tavmjong Bah wrote:
Hi,
I finally got around to doing a review of the code of conduct as I
agreed to do at the last IRC board meeting. I apologize for taking so
long. I think the text looks great! I also think it might be time to
remove the "draft" stuff (Work in Progress at top, copies of other code
of conducts at bottom.)
I made some minor editing changes:
* "Even if" -> "For example, if" (avoid awkward repeating of
"even")
* "are conflicted" -> "have a conflict of interest"
* "feeling" -> "feel"
* "parent organization" -> "collaborating organizations" (We
don't
really have a parent organization and the text should apply, for
example, to our internet hosts.)
Tav
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-board mailing list
Inkscape-board(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-board
11:45 p.m.
2015-11-20 5:19 GMT-08:00 Martin Owens <doctormo@...23...>:
Thanks Tav,
I've edited it up and we'll start considering this a non-draft live
document from now.
https://inkscape.org/en/community/coc/
Changes can still be made, but we're basicalyl done with this task.
Thanks everyone!
Great :)
I like the graphic at the top.
I added my e-mail in the reporting section as discussed during the
board meeting. Ideally there should also be Martin's e-mail for
reporting problems on the website, but so far it looks OK.
Just in case: how do we "ban" someone from the mailing lists? I assume
administrator access to the mailing list is required? And how do we
expunge messages with dox material from the archives? I know it's
unlikely we'll have to do any of this in the near future, as our
contributors are in general well-behaved, but we should do a "fire
drill" to ensure that we know how to handle a problem.
Best regards, Krzysztof
4:34 p.m.
On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 23:45 -0800, Krzysztof Kosiński wrote:
Just in case: how do we "ban" someone from the mailing lists? I assume
administrator access to the mailing list is required? And how do we
expunge messages with dox material from the archives? I know it's
unlikely we'll have to do any of this in the near future, as our
contributors are in general well-behaved, but we should do a "fire
drill" to ensure that we know how to handle a problem.
Good question. It's something we'll have to practice on the new mailing
lists too... as soon as we've gotten everything live :-)
Martin,
7:12 p.m.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Krzysztof Kosiński <tweenk.pl@...119.....>
wrote:
Just in case: how do we "ban" someone from the mailing
lists? I assume
administrator access to the mailing list is required? And how do we
expunge messages with dox material from the archives?
I'm the admin for the User list on SF and I dug around a bit for banning
and there two ways to go about restricting things. 1) Banning. There is an
actual ban list for each mailing list. We currently have no people on the
ban_list for the user mailing list. 2) Limiting participation. Allow
someone to remain subscribed but set their posts to be moderated... which
would be a pre-ban/probation step imho.
Unfortunately, I didn't see any way to expunge archived messages, only
attachments. This should definitely be a requirement of whatever we move
to. Even if not outright deleted, it needs to be non-visible in public
archives.
Cheers,
Josh
8:56 p.m.
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 07:12:43PM -0800, Josh Andler wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Krzysztof Kosiński
<tweenk.pl@...39...3...>
wrote:
> Just in case: how do we "ban" someone from the mailing lists? I assume
> administrator access to the mailing list is required? And how do we
> expunge messages with dox material from the archives?
I'm the admin for the User list on SF and I dug around a bit for banning
and there two ways to go about restricting things. 1) Banning. There is an
actual ban list for each mailing list. We currently have no people on the
ban_list for the user mailing list. 2) Limiting participation. Allow
someone to remain subscribed but set their posts to be moderated... which
would be a pre-ban/probation step imho.
I'm the admin for the remaining (non-user) lists, and I routinely ban
spammers. Banning someone from inkscape-devel@ is technically easy
enough.
I've been involved in banning of project members in other open source
projects prior to my involvement in Inkscape, and I really, really don't
want to have to go through that again. I'm proud this has only come up
once in our project, and hope it never is an issue for us in the future.
Unfortunately, I didn't see any way to expunge archived messages,
only
attachments. This should definitely be a requirement of whatever we move
to. Even if not outright deleted, it needs to be non-visible in public
archives.
My memory is cloudy, bug I vaguely recall having to do this once before
in Inkscape mailing lists. I don't remember how we accomplished the
expunge, but I think we might have had to work through SourceForge tech
support.
In any case, I agree it's a great idea we should practice doing an
expunge with our new mailing lists. If we have to go through OSUOSL to
do it, then that might be an issue as it may risk adding undesireable
delay to the procedure.
Bryce
9:02 p.m.
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Bryce Harrington <bryce@...2...
wrote:
In any case, I agree it's a great idea we should practice doing
an
expunge with our new mailing lists.
The only concern I have is whether it should be expunged completely, or
akin to how record are expunged in the US justice system... it's removed
from both public and privileged view, but it can be "recovered" in special
circumstances. I would assume we would want special recovery available, but
if people want to push against that we should probably seek the advice of
SFC.
Cheers,
Josh
2930
days inactive
2932
days old
inkscape-board@lists.inkscape.org
6 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Bryce Harrington -
Josh Andler -
Krzysztof Kosiński -
Martin Owens -
Tavmjong Bah