On 03/13/2015 05:34 AM, Tavmjong Bah wrote:

I'm confused. How does "Each elected Member shall continue to serve on the Committee until she or he resigns from the position." and "Elections shall occur at a time and place that the Members shall determine, but must be held at least every two (2) years." work?

Instead of requiring that elections take place on a two-year cycle, the agreement requires Inkscape to have elections *at least* every two years. So, if the Inkscape community wanted to remove a particularly problematic committee member, you wouldn't have to wait until the end of a "term" before that member could be voted out. The flip side, though, is that members would not have a set term of office. They'd serve on the committee until they resigned or were removed via other means specified elsewhere in the section (by community vote in an election or for lack of participation in the committee).

I can clarify this point by editing that sentence to state "Each elected Member shall continue to serve...until she or he resigns from the position, /or is otherwise removed from the position under the provisions of this section/."

That being said: if you would prefer Inkscape to have a set election cycle with X-year terms, we can certainly write it that way instead.

Overall, I've tried to avoid getting too detailed regarding the mechanics of the electoral process in the text of the FSA. I'd rather allow the committee to modify the electoral process without having to amend/update the entire FSA. But, if by doing so, I've introduced ambiguity, let me know, and we can add more structure here. But, bear in mind that changing the terms of the FSA down the road will require more work than modifying the election rules (which would only require sending an updated written description to Conservancy for our consent, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld).