On Jan 8, 2008 3:55 AM, jiho <jo.irisson@...155...> wrote:
On 2008-January-07 , at 18:46 , Josh Andler wrote: Should we base our vote purely on aesthetics or should we take the inclusion of new features into account? The guidelines of the contest clearly stated that: "It must use SVG filters and/or Live Path Effects. We also recommend you explore the 3D box tool and the tweak tool (as well as the "engravers toolbox" via the calligraphy tool)."
Given that I think that we should: 1- disqualify (politely) those which did not use the requires ones (SVG filters and/or Live Path Effects) 2a- give bonus points to those which used several of these features and/or 2b- put a mention of those in the voting entry text and clearly state that the inclusion of such features should be valued in the rating (maybe add a note next to each entry about which of those features are included)
What do people think?
I don't know about disqualifying those that didn't use the effects, but at least it would be nice to have a blurb for each that explains what effects were used. I would prefer to vote for one that uses as many new features as possible (while still standing on aesthetic merits), but at the moment I have no idea which those are.
--bb