13 Dec
2006
13 Dec
'06
12:18 a.m.
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:27:43 -0500, Gary <pajer@...1943...> wrote:
That's not how I read it. He might be supportive of OS software, and is trying to find out why its not more pervasive. In any event, wouldn't you(we) want to know where and why our OS initiatives fall short? I admit I'd feel more comfortable if I had some assurance that he's making at least an attempt at being neutral.
I'm not particularly worried about his intent (which I'm not really in a position to assess); I'm just concerned that his methodology looks severely flawed.
-mental