4:32 a.m.
Op Wo, 1 juli, 2009 12:01, schreef LucaDC:
These are my humble suggestions:
1) when moving the guide (no modifiers) you always also move (and snap)
the
origin, that goes under the cursor, in 2D (so wherever you click you
always
grab the guide at its origin: why moving the guide keeping the origin at
the
original distance from the grab/snapping point?); this behaviour would be
consistent (=intuitive) to what happens when you create a guide;
That makes sense! If no one comes up with a valid use case for the current
behavior then I will implement it the way you suggest.
2) if shift is pressed when clicking, the guides always rotate
(snapping
to
what's around or, if you press ctrl after the rotation is started, to
absolute angles, i.e. always starting from 0, using the step specified in
the preferences for when rotating objects);
So shift rotates ...
3) if ctrl-shift is pressed when clicking, the origin moves
constrained to
the guide (snapping to what's around projected perpendicularly to the
guide;
if you want something different you can create a new guide and snap to the
intersection, while creating a guide perpendicular to a given one is not
always straightforward; this is a general consideration regarding snapping
while constrained).
... but when "adding ctrl to shift" not only it becomes constrained, but
it also changes from rotation to translation. In my opinion using ctrl
should only make the motion constrained, and not change the type of
transformation simultaneously.
So:
A) when dragging with no modifiers we will move the origin to the pointer
location (freely, in 2D)
B) with ctrl we will have a constrained translation of the origin along
the guide
C) with shift we will rotate
D) with ctrl-shift we will rotate to increments of the absolute angle
and with A), B), and C) Inkscape will snap depending on the snapping
parameters.
It looks like we're converging here, aren't we ;-) ? What do you think?
Diederik
5:35 p.m.
New subject: rotating guides
Good.
I'd only warn about using ctrl alone as modifier as it's already in use to
delete the guide.
You could end up in accidentally deleting the guide of which you want to
move the origin.
Luca
Diederik van Lierop wrote:
So:
A) when dragging with no modifiers we will move the origin to the pointer
location (freely, in 2D)
B) with ctrl we will have a constrained translation of the origin along
the guide
C) with shift we will rotate
D) with ctrl-shift we will rotate to increments of the absolute angle
and with A), B), and C) Inkscape will snap depending on the snapping
parameters.
It looks like we're converging here, aren't we ;-) ? What do you think?
Diederik
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-devel mailing list
Inkscape-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/rotating-guides-tp24145025p24351661.html
Sent from the Inkscape - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
7:33 a.m.
New subject: rotating guides
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Diederik van Lierop<mail@...1689...> wrote:
1) We could distinguish between pressing ctrl before or after
pressing the
mouse button, but that's not very attractive.
2) We could leave the ctrl key for deleting, and do a constrained
translation of the origin only when the guide is grabbed near its origin,
and do a free translation of the guide when grabbing it elsewhere (and
positioning the origin at the location where we release the mouse button).
3) We could find another way to easily delete guides and use ctrl for
constrained translation. That's what most consistent because ctrl is used in
many cases already for constrained transformations. But I'm afraid that
people already got used to ctrl-click deletion, so we will have to find a
_really_ good alternative if we want to get consensus on this. What about
pressing the delete key when already dragging? It's a bit more laborious
than just ctrl-click, but it's close to being perfect IMHO. Any other
suggestions?
What's wrong with only constrained rotating with Ctrl+Shift, and
deleting with Ctrl? This is what we have in the code right now and it
works for me.
--
bulia byak
Inkscape. Draw Freely.
http://www.inkscape.org
11:44 a.m.
New subject: rotating guides
2009/7/8 Diederik van Lierop <mail@...1689...>:
So we will end up like this
A) when dragging with no modifiers we will move the origin to the pointer
location (freely, in 2D)
B) with ctrl we will have a constrained translation of the origin along the
guide
C) with shift we will rotate
D) with ctrl-shift we will rotate to increments of the absolute angle
E) when pressing delete when hovering above a guide in the selector tool, or
while dragging a guide, the guide will be deleted. We can even add a context
menu as Luca suggested
If I remember correctly then this quick-deleting was not available in v0.46,
or was it? We'd better change (or at least find consensus on either
solution) now, before we hit the masses!
I agree. And I'd vote for the above suggestion, too, because it's the
most consistent and foreseeable. Indeed, quick-deleting with
Ctrl+click was introduced not so long ago, more or less as a quick
solution and because it wasn't foreseeable that full
translation/rotation abilities of guides were going to be implemented
soon. Now that these are availabe I'd personally vote for the more
consistent set of controls as described by Diederik above. The only
small thing is that I find it a bit inconvenient to use Delete because
it's located at the top right corner of the keyboard instead of
conveniently on the lower left. But it's still good enough, I guess.
Perhaps we can additionally have something like Ctrl+Alt+Click for
quick-deletion (or something similar; I don't know what would be most
appropriate)?
Max
4:49 p.m.
New subject: rotating guides
For what it's worth, I suppose you already know that I completely agree.
I hope you'll find time to work on it soon.
Luca
Diederik van Lierop wrote:
On 07/08/2009 04:44 AM, Maximilian Albert wrote:
2009/7/8 Diederik van Lierop <mail@...1689...> :
So we will end up like this
A) when dragging with no modifiers we will move the origin to the pointer
location (freely, in 2D)
B) with ctrl we will have a constrained translation of the origin along
the
guide
C) with shift we will rotate
D) with ctrl-shift we will rotate to increments of the absolute angle
E) when pressing delete when hovering above a guide in the selector tool,
or
while dragging a guide, the guide will be deleted. We can even add a
context
menu as Luca suggested
If I remember correctly then this quick-deleting was not available in
v0.46,
or was it? We'd better change (or at least find consensus on either
solution) now, before we hit the masses!
I agree. And I'd vote for the above suggestion, too, because it's the
most consistent and foreseeable.
Hi Max, thanks for chimming in!
So if no one has any serious objections then I'll go ahead and change
this as soon as possible.
Diederik
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full
prize
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-devel mailing list
Inkscape-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/rotating-guides-tp24145025p24457452.html
Sent from the Inkscape - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
12:31 a.m.
New subject: rotating guides
2009/7/8 Diederik van Lierop <mail@...1689...>:
So we will end up like this
A) when dragging with no modifiers we will move the origin to the pointer
location (freely, in 2D)
B) with ctrl we will have a constrained translation of the origin along the
guide
C) with shift we will rotate
D) with ctrl-shift we will rotate to increments of the absolute angle
E) when pressing delete when hovering above a guide in the selector tool, or
while dragging a guide, the guide will be deleted. We can even add a context
menu as Luca suggested
I just commited the corresponding changes to SVN (rev. 21846). Please
test extensively and report anything which is not yet as desired or
can still be improved. Apart from the things listed above, I also made
the cursor switch correctly between rotation and translation depending
on whether Shift is pressed or not (this didn't work 100% before) and
also removed the info about keyboard modifiers from the guides dialog
(the one which opens when double-clicking on a guide) because it's
essentially useless there and consumes a lot of space.
Some comments or issues I couldn't resolve:
1) There is a strange bug which can reproduced as follows: Start
Inkscape afresh and drag a guide out of the ruler. Then hover the
mouse over it and press Delete. Nothing happens, and the status bar
shows the message "Nothing was deleted". Now click anywhere on the
canvas, hover again over the guide and press Delete. This time the
guide gets deleted as intended. Even when the canvas-click occurs
before creating the guide, everything is normal. It seems a bit like
the canvas first has to be "activated" before keyboard events are
processed correctly.
The reason for this strange behaviour is that the first time the key
press is not propagated to sp_dt_guide_event() but gets caught earlier
and is then processed in sp_selection_delete(). However, after the
canvas-click the propagation to sp_dt_guide_event() works fine. I have
no clue where this comes from and any hints are greatly appreciated.
BTW, this is also the reason why the cursor doesn't change when you
hover over a newly created guide and press Shift (this also only works
after a canvas-click).
2) I don't know what to include in the status bar message. With a
description of all modifiers the message is definitely too long. Right
now I have it say "Shift+drag to rotate, Ctrl+drag to move origin, Del
to delete". In particular, I dropped "Drag to move" because it seemed
to me that users would expect this intuitively. Other suggestions?
3) IMHO it would be nice if the kind of guide movement could change
interactively when pressing/releasing a modifier while dragging a
guide. For example, when we start dragging and press Shift (while
continuing to drag) it would be nice if the motion switched to a
rotation. Or when starting to move the origin by Ctrl+dragging and
releasing the Ctrl key then the motion should switch to regular
dragging. What do you think? I tried to implement this but encountered
a bug similar to the one described in (1) which prevents some keyboard
events from being passed to sp_dt_guide_event(). I'm not sure if it's
caused by the same thing, though. Any hints where to look are again
highly appreciated.
4) LucaDC said he felt that the new cursor which appeared when
dragging a guide conveyed a feeling of imprecision, so I changed it
back to the original arrow-shaped cursor. For rotation, however, I
still use the new cursor. Is everyone happy with that?
5) In principle, snapping guides to other objects should work, but I
only manage to snap guides to other guides and to nothing else.
Diederik?
6) As mentioned above, guides are now deleted by pressing Del when
hovering over them. Is this sufficient or should we implement a second
shortcut similar to the original one (like Alt+Ctrl+click)?
Thanks for any comments!
Regards,
Max
3:54 a.m.
New subject: rotating guides
On 07/16/2009 05:31 PM, Maximilian Albert wrote:
I just commited the corresponding changes to SVN (rev. 21846).
Please
test extensively and report anything which is not yet as desired or
can still be improved.
Works like a charm! This behavior is far more intuitive IMHO!
One thing we could add is that ctrl-clicking on a guide at some distance
of the origin immediately moves the origin to that position on the
guide. Now you first have to get the origin and drag it to where you
want it.
5) In principle, snapping guides to other objects should work, but I
only manage to snap guides to other guides and to nothing else.
Diederik?
Snapping to objects works for me. Did you select the "snap to cusp
nodes" button on the snap toolbar? By default no snap target is enabled,
only the guides and the grids. Guides do not snap to grids yet, I still
need to implement that.
6) As mentioned above, guides are now deleted by pressing Del when
hovering over them. Is this sufficient or should we implement a second
shortcut similar to the original one (like Alt+Ctrl+click)?
While dragging or rotating a guide and pressing delete, nothing happens.
However when I'm dragging the origin with ctrl, pressing del deletes the
guide.
Thanks for your work Max, it's much appreciated!
Diederik
2:48 p.m.
New subject: rotating guides
Hi,
Is it possible to prevent the guide line from being moved when double
clicking on it (i.e. when opening the guide-line dialog)? The movement
make the "Relative change" option rather pointless as well as messing up
carefully set x and y values.
Tav
8:20 p.m.
New subject: rotating guides
Hi Tav,
    Is it possible to prevent the guide line from being moved when
double
clicking on it (i.e. when opening the guide-line dialog)? The movement
make the "Relative change" option rather pointless as well as messing up
carefully set x and y values.
Sorry, but I cannot reproduce the problem. When I manually set the
position of a guide (e.g., via the guidelines dialog itself) and then
double click on it, I always get the same coordinates back when the
dialog opens. Can you give precise steps how to see the problem?
Best,
Max
4:01 a.m.
New subject: rotating guides
Hi Max,
> Is it possible to prevent the guide line from being moved
when double
> clicking on it (i.e. when opening the guide-line dialog)? The movement
> make the "Relative change" option rather pointless as well as messing up
> carefully set x and y values.
Sorry, but I cannot reproduce the problem. When I manually set the
position of a guide (e.g., via the guidelines dialog itself) and then
double click on it, I always get the same coordinates back when the
dialog opens. Can you give precise steps how to see the problem?
Hmmm, a little investigation shows that the problem only happens when I
am using the mouse with my Wacom tablet. If I use the laptop track pad
and buttons, the guide lines don't move.
Tav
2:47 a.m.
New subject: rotating guides
2009/7/18 Tavmjong Bah <tavmjong@...8...>:
> > Is it possible to prevent the guide line from being
moved when double
> > clicking on it (i.e. when opening the guide-line dialog)? The movement
> > make the "Relative change" option rather pointless as well as messing
up
> > carefully set x and y values.
>
> Sorry, but I cannot reproduce the problem. When I manually set the
> position of a guide (e.g., via the guidelines dialog itself) and then
> double click on it, I always get the same coordinates back when the
> dialog opens. Can you give precise steps how to see the problem?
Hmmm, a little investigation shows that the problem only happens when I
am using the mouse with my Wacom tablet. If I use the laptop track pad
and buttons, the guide lines don't move.
That's odd, but unfortunately I cannot help with this because I don't
own a tablet. Did this behaviour already occur before my recent
changes? What happens, exactly? Does the guide already move after the
first of the two clicks or only after the second? By what amount, on
average? Do you inadvertently move the cursor between the two clicks
and are the two distances related, e.g., is the guide movement larger
if the second click happens further away from the first one?
Max
1:16 a.m.
New subject: rotating guides
Great work!
In particular, I dropped "Drag to move" because it seemed
to me that users would expect this intuitively. Other suggestions?
I agree.
3) IMHO it would be nice if the kind of guide movement could change
interactively when pressing/releasing a modifier while dragging a
guide.
I think that this could be confusing. Anyway, if you think it would be
useful...
4) LucaDC said he felt that the new cursor which appeared when
dragging a guide conveyed a feeling of imprecision, so I changed it
back to the original arrow-shaped cursor.
Thanks a lot. :)
For rotation, however, I
still use the new cursor. Is everyone happy with that?
I am. The problem was
grabbing the guide: after the operation has started
you don't need precision in the cursor anymore as you look at the object you
are moving, not at the cursor, I think (at least I do so).
6) As mentioned above, guides are now deleted by pressing Del when
hovering over them. Is this sufficient or should we implement a second
shortcut similar to the original one (like Alt+Ctrl+click)?
I won't add more
shortcuts: then you have do document them, add a message on
the status bar and so on...
Thanks for any comments!
Regards,
Max
Thanks to you.
Just let me add a couple of things:
- delete doesn't work for me (Windows) while dragging the guide (actually,
I don't think it's important);
- we spoke about showing the origin only when needed, so while dragging,
rotating its guide or sliding through it; is this difficoult to implement?
- there's still no snapping while moving the origin throug the guide.
(ok, I know they are three... :)
Luca
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-devel mailing list
Inkscape-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/rotating-guides-tp24145025p24537495.html
Sent from the Inkscape - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
10:12 p.m.
New subject: rotating guides
On 07/17/2009 06:16 PM, LucaDC wrote:
- we spoke about showing the origin only when needed, so while
dragging,
rotating its guide or sliding through it; is this difficoult to implement?
If we want to snap objects to the origin of the guide then the origin
should probably be visible at all time. Do we want to snap to guide
origins?
- there's still no snapping while moving the origin throug the
guide.
Works for me! (but please remind that snapping guides to grids has not
been implemented yet). Can you give me a bit more details, e.g. what
snapping options have been enabled and what the steps are to reproduce
this behavior?
Diederik
5:45 p.m.
New subject: rotating guides
On 07/17/2009 06:16 PM, LucaDC wrote:
If we want to snap objects to the origin of the guide then the origin
should probably be visible at all time. Do we want to snap to guide
origins?
My opinon is that I won't snap on guides origins: a guide is a guide
and
shouldn't have "preferences" over its points. If you want to snap to a
particular point you can use two guides and snap to the intersection. Also,
I prefer not seeing all those little circles on the drawing: when there are
a lot of guides I find them visually disturbing and sometimes I drag them
out of view to clean things up.
> - there's still no snapping while moving the origin throug
the guide.
Works for me! (but please remind that snapping guides to grids has not
been implemented yet). Can you give me a bit more details, e.g. what
snapping options have been enabled and what the steps are to reproduce
this behavior?
I simply expect the origin to snap wherever the guide snaps when
dragging it
in 2D. Now this doesn't happen for me in WXP.
E.g.:
- draw a rectangle;
- add a guide and snap it to a corner (e.g. bottom-left);
- rotate the guide so it snaps to the opposite corner (e.g. top-right);
- drag the center on the guide to snap it on the opposite corner
(top-right): it doesn't.
Luca
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-devel mailing list
Inkscape-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/rotating-guides-tp24145025p24565959.html
Sent from the Inkscape - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
4:30 p.m.
New subject: rotating guides
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 8:16 PM, LucaDC wrote:
> 6) As mentioned above, guides are now deleted by pressing Del
when
> hovering over them. Is this sufficient or should we implement a second
> shortcut similar to the original one (like Alt+Ctrl+click)?
I won't add more shortcuts: then you have do document them, add a message on
the status bar and so on...
Well, I've grown to love Ctrl+Click, but I won't bitch about this
change even if deleting guides is longer now :)
Alexandre
7 p.m.
New subject: rotating guides
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
Well, I've grown to love Ctrl+Click, but I won't bitch about
this
change even if deleting guides is longer now :)
Yes, deleting guides is longer now, indeed: I always ctrl-click first, then
remember it doesn't work anymore and finally press delete... :)
I hope I'll get used as quickly as I learned ctrl-click.
One drawback of del is that if you have an object selected, you hover on a
guide to delete it but slightly move the mouse just before pressing del, you
delete the object. It's so difficoult to highlight a guide being the
selection margin so narrow!
Maybe a way to click-select the guide to delete (so the guide remains
selected also after you move the mouse away from it) would simplify the
operation.
And you could also select many guides (with shift) and delete them all
together with a single "del".
In fact, there is still the (old) problem of deleting many guides (non all
guides!): let me suggest something like a "guide rubber", i.e. something
like a selection rectangle that kills every guide it intersects or a
particular "fat" cursor that annihilates all guides it's clicked on.
Ah, and click-selecting guides could also allow copy-paste to generate a new
guide starting from an existing one, which is useful when you have
strange-angled guides.
And you could move a "guide set" to a different point...
Sorry, too many things!
Luca
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/rotating-guides-tp24145025p24566909.html
Sent from the Inkscape - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
3:50 a.m.
New subject: rotating guides
On 20/7/09 12:00, LucaDC wrote:
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> Well, I've grown to love Ctrl+Click, but I won't bitch about this
> change even if deleting guides is longer now :)
Yes, deleting guides is longer now, indeed: I always ctrl-click first, then
remember it doesn't work anymore and finally press delete... :)
I hope I'll get used as quickly as I learned ctrl-click.
One drawback of del is that if you have an object selected, you hover on a
guide to delete it but slightly move the mouse just before pressing del, you
delete the object. It's so difficoult to highlight a guide being the
selection margin so narrow!
While I never really appreciated the new way to delete a guide (I have
to reach across the keyboard (laptop) for the <Backspace> key, whereas
<Ctrl> is in reach of the resting left hand) now I long for the previous
behavior! Many times I accidentally have removed a selected object
instead of the to-be-deleted guide - without noticing first, so that I
was forced to go through the undo list to discover how far I needed to
go back to retrieve the lost object.
Maybe a way to click-select the guide to delete (so the guide
remains
selected also after you move the mouse away from it) would simplify the
operation.
It would not simplify the operation but give the user the necessary
feedback which object will be deleted with <DEL>. The color-changing of
hovering indicator is too easily overlooked when the mouse cursor is
slightly moved before the delete command. For me this seems increasingly
like a regression the more often I work with the new (and otherwise
fantastically improved!) guides features.
And you could also select many guides (with shift) and delete them
all
together with a single "del".
seconded.
~suv
p.s. as an interim workaround to delete them all there's the extension
'Remove Guides' at
<http://screencasters.heathenx.org/blog/2009/06/09/inkscape-extension-remo...
- maybe a candidate to be included in 0.47?
8:36 p.m.
New subject: rotating guides
On 07/16/2009 05:31 PM, Maximilian Albert wrote:
3) IMHO it would be nice if the kind of guide movement could change
interactively when pressing/releasing a modifier while dragging a
guide.
Yes, I agree that that would be nice. However I don't have a clue
what's
going on in that bug you mentioned.
One little quirk I noticed when dragging the origin with ctrl: If you
press shift too then the pointer changes to rotation, but you cannot
actually rotate.
Diederik
7:39 p.m.
New subject: rotating guides
Diederik van Lierop wrote:
On 07/07/2009 12:33 AM, bulia byak wrote:
...
We should allow for free translation of the guide and constrained
translation of its origin. Most logically the former should have no
modifier key, whereas the latter should use the ctrl key because in many
other case the ctrl-key is used for constraining already. But as you
noticed the ctrl-key has already been assigned to deleting. On top of
that, rotating the guide and translating the origin, which are two very
different things, are both activated by shift, and the distinction
between these two modes is in where you grab the guide. Once you're used
to that it's OK, but it's not very straightforward. It's much cleaner to
have it like this:
no modifiers for moving
shift for rotation
ctrl for constraining
delete for deleting
So we will end up like this
A) when dragging with no modifiers we will move the origin to the
pointer location (freely, in 2D)
B) with ctrl we will have a constrained translation of the origin along
the guide
I might be too late, but it seems to me that we will have more
consistent behavior if we follow existing keybinding of other tools. For
example, here is what "Inkscape keyboard and mouse reference" says,
*Ctrl+Alt+mouse drag - move along handles*
This restricts movement to the directions of the node's handles, their
continuations and perpendiculars (total 8 snaps).
Ignoring rotation part, Ctrl+Alt will, with this modification, still
move handle point along (guide) line.
This small change would make behavior of somehow similar tools (to some
extent), well, similar. The only difference would be Shift becoming from
- no-snap modifier to - rotate modifier.
Hope this will be considered, at least.
Vlada
C) with shift we will rotate
D) with ctrl-shift we will rotate to increments of the absolute angle
E) when pressing delete when hovering above a guide in the selector
tool, or while dragging a guide, the guide will be deleted. We can even
add a context menu as Luca suggested
If I remember correctly then this quick-deleting was not available in
v0.46, or was it? We'd better change (or at least find consensus on
either solution) now, before we hit the masses!
Diederik
8:40 p.m.
New subject: rotating guides
2009/7/17 Vladimir Savic <vladimir.firefly.savic@...400...>:
I might be too late, [...]
It is never too late in open source software. :-) However, I'd like to
hear other people's opinions on this before implementing it because
I've used Inkscape very little for real production work lately so that
I feel I can't thoroughly judge usability questions.
but it seems to me that we will have more
consistent behavior if we follow existing keybinding of other tools. For
example, here is what "Inkscape keyboard and mouse reference" says,
*Ctrl+Alt+mouse drag - move along handles*
This restricts movement to the directions of the node's handles, their
continuations and perpendiculars (total 8 snaps).
Ignoring rotation part, Ctrl+Alt will, with this modification, still
move handle point along (guide) line.
This small change would make behavior of somehow similar tools (to some
extent), well, similar. The only difference would be Shift becoming from
- no-snap modifier to - rotate modifier.
I'm not sure if I understood the last paragraph correctly. Just to
make sure, your suggestion is to use Ctrl+Alt instead of Ctrl for
moving the anchor along the guide, right? Frankly, I'm not convinced.
If we implement this change then the Ctrl modifier (whithout Alt) will
be unused. Firstly, this forces the user to unnecessarily press a
second modifier to obtain constrained movement, which is cumbersome,
and secondly, it makes the feature a little less discoverable. In the
Node tool the Ctrl modifier alone also has a certain meaning, and it
is also related to constrained movement (as is generally the case in
Inkscape), so my personal opinion is that the analogy is still there
and we should leave it as it is. But I'm open to different opinions.
What do other people think?
Max
8:01 p.m.
New subject: rotating guides
On 07/17/2009 12:39 PM, Vladimir Savic wrote:
I might be too late,
You're never too late, as Max already
said!
example, here is what "Inkscape keyboard and mouse
reference" says,
Thanks for pointing me at this document, I didn't know it existed!
*Ctrl+Alt+mouse drag - move along handles*
This restricts movement to the directions of the node's handles, their
continuations and perpendiculars (total 8 snaps).
Ignoring rotation part, Ctrl+Alt will, with this modification, still
move handle point along (guide) line.
But when looking at the selector tool, the rectangle tool, the star
tool, the ellipse tool, and probably other tools too, you'll notice that
there ctrl is used for constraining, so I'd prefer just ctrl, instead of
ctrl-alt. On the other hand, it currently doesn't matter whether you use
ctrl or ctrl+alt because Inkscape only looks for the ctrl key.
Diederik
1:21 a.m.
New subject: rotating guides
The reason I didn't suggest to think about a new way to delete guides is the
same that you explained: it's really difficoult to find a good alternative.
Ctrl-click is strange (I often did it by mistake at the beginning) but when
you get used it's easy. I was used to drag the guide outside the canvas but
now I never do so anymore (also if I've seen it works in Inkscape too now, I
can't say since when).
Left-click and select "delete guide"? Now there is no specific context menu
for guides.
But the new command should be very quick as the plugin for deleting all
guides is not easily reachable and one could need to delete a lot of guides
but not all existing ones.
I really have no other suggestions but either keeping the
distance-dependent-click or introducing a new modifier. Up to now I would
keep the former as it's already implemented.
I agree it's a pity that ctrl-click was allocated to something that has
nothing to do with constrained moving. Personally I could sacrifice the
quick-deleting command to coherence, but I feel it's not a practical
solution.
Luca
Diederik van Lierop wrote:
On 07/06/2009 10:35 AM, LucaDC wrote:
I'd only warn about using ctrl alone as modifier as it's already in use
to delete the guide.
You could end up in accidentally deleting the guide of which you want to
move the origin.
Good point, I hadn't thought of that yet but I would have certainly run
into this problem. Thanks!
1) We could distinguish between pressing ctrl before or after pressing
the mouse button, but that's not very attractive.
2) We could leave the ctrl key for deleting, and do a constrained
translation of the origin only when the guide is grabbed near its
origin, and do a free translation of the guide when grabbing it
elsewhere (and positioning the origin at the location where we release
the mouse button).
3) We could find another way to easily delete guides and use ctrl for
constrained translation. That's what most consistent because ctrl is
used in
many cases already for constrained transformations. But I'm afraid that
people already got used to ctrl-click deletion, so we will have to find
a
_really_ good alternative if we want to get consensus on this. What
about pressing the delete key when already dragging? It's a bit more
laborious than just ctrl-click, but it's close to being perfect IMHO.
Any other suggestions?
Diederik
Diederik van Lierop wrote:
So:
A) when dragging with no modifiers we will move the origin to the pointer
location (freely, in 2D)
B) with ctrl we will have a constrained translation of the origin along
the guide
C) with shift we will rotate
D) with ctrl-shift we will rotate to increments of the absolute angle
and with A), B), and C) Inkscape will snap depending on the snapping
parameters.
It looks like we're converging here, aren't we ;-) ? What do you think?
Diederik
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-devel mailing list
Inkscape-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-devel mailing list
Inkscape-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/rotating-guides-tp24145025p24376635.html
Sent from the Inkscape - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
4992
days inactive
5078
days old
inkscape-devel@lists.inkscape.org
25 comments
8 participants
participants (8)
-
Alexandre Prokoudine -
bulia byak -
Diederik van Lierop -
LucaDC -
Maximilian Albert -
Tavmjong Bah -
Vladimir Savic -
~suv