March 2014 - Inkscape Devel - Inkscape Mailman

win32 build working again
by Bob Jamison 08 Apr '24

08 Apr '24

The win32 build, which was broken for the weekend, is working again. I just made a "manual autobuild" again, so that we can see how it looks on Windows: http://troi.titan-aeu.com/~rjamison/inkscape/builds/ Bob

2 1

performance problems and possible remedies?
by Yale Zhang 29 Sep '16

29 Sep '16

Hi. I'm using Inkscape to author a comic and the slow speed for certain things is very annoying. I'm already have OpenMP turned on and using 4 cores. 1. *large blurs are slow* - I'm an expert with writing SIMD code, so I was thinking about vectorizing the Gaussian IIR filter with SIMD intrinsics, even though it's harder than for a FIR. But I noticed there isn't any SIMD code in Inkscape so does that mean it's something to avoid. I'm pretty sure no current compiler is smart enough to vectorize it, and besides, Inkscape is compiled with -O2, meaning -ftree-vectorize isn't on by default. 2. *when there's a large image (raster based) background - scrolling in a zoomed region is very slow* I compiled the latest 0.49 code with GCC profiling and it shows this: 33.98 22.47 22.47 exp2l 21.29 36.55 14.08 log2l 17.57 48.17 11.62 pow 7.12 52.88 4.71 658 0.01 0.01 ink_cairo_surface_srgb_to_linear(_cairo_surface*) 6.72 57.32 4.44 563 0.01 0.01 ink_cairo_surface_linear_to_srgb(_cairo_surface*) 5.51 60.96 3.64 1216 0.00 0.00 Inkscape::Filters::FilterGaussian::~FilterGaussian() 5.23 64.42 3.46 internal_modf 0.59 64.81 0.39 _mcount_private 0.41 65.08 0.27 __fentry__ 0.12 65.16 0.08 GC_mark_from 0.09 65.22 0.06 5579 0.00 0.00 Geom::parse_svg_path(char const*, Geom::SVGPathSink&) 0.06 65.26 0.04 35320 0.00 0.00 bounds_exact_transformed(std::vector<Geom::Path, std::allocator<Geom::Path> > const&, Geom::Affine const&) 0.06 65.30 0.04 8 0.01 0.01 convert_pixbuf_normal_to_argb32(_GdkPixbuf*) 0.05 65.33 0.03 885444 0.00 0.00 std::vector<Geom::Linear, std::allocator<Geom::Linear> >::_M_fill_insert(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<Geom::Linear*, std::vector<Geom::Linear, std::allocator<Geom::Linear> > >, unsigned long long, Geom::Linear const&) The cost is absolutely dominated by ink_cairo_surface_srgb_to_linear() and ink_cairo_surface_linear_to_srgb(). My first instinct was to optimize those 2 functions, but then I thought why are those even being called every time I scroll through the image? Why not convert the images up front to linear and stay that way in memory? If that can't be done, then my optimization approach is: 1. replace ink_cairo_surface_srgb_to_linear() with a simple 3rd degree polynomial approximation (0.902590573087882 - 0.010238759806148x + 0.002825455367280x^2 + 0.000004414767235x^3) and vectorize with SSE intrinsics. The approximation was calculated by minimizing the square error (maxError = 0.313) over the range [10, 255]. For x < 10, it uses simple scaling. 2. replace ink_surface_linear_to_srgb() with a vectorized implementation of pow(). Unlike srgb_to_linear(), a low degree polynomial can't be used due to the curve having larger high order derivatives. An alternative would be piece wise, low order polynomials. The main question I have is what degree of accuracy is desired? Certainly, it doesn't need double precision pow() since the input is only 8 bits! Is +- 0.5 from the true value (before quantization) OK or do people depend on getting pixel perfect results? UJ

7 20

Create releases more regularly
by Sebastian Zartner 15 Feb '16

15 Feb '16

Hi there, I initially asked at inkscapeforum.com<http://www.inkscapeforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=15755&p=63224>and was told to better post my request to this mailing list. I wonder if it wouldn't be possible to create releases more regularly. Currently there are many months or even years between each release of Inkscape. Bug fixes should get out more quickly and it should be possible to try out new features of upcoming versions. Most users don't have the possibility to build Inkscape by their own, so they have to wait for the next release. Unfortunately the provided development downloads are not synchronized, hosted on different third-party web sites and out of date (currently especially the Windows version). So I suggest to create a (more or less) fixed fast release cycle for normal releases (e.g. every two or three months) and periodically (e.g. every one or two weeks) create alpha versions. Alpha versions should be built (maybe even automatically) for all supported OSes and hosted directly on inkscape.org. Sebastian

17 40

Re: [Inkscape-devel] Devlibs 46 too slow
by Mark Titchener 04 Feb '16

04 Feb '16

I tried your modified build with an NVidia Quadro 1000M on Windows 7 and it seemed okay to me. > Le Jeudi 21 novembre 2013 9h09, Nicolas Dufour <nicoduf@...48...> a ?crit > : > > I'm still investigating the issue, and just found out that the computers > I > > used to reproduced the bug were all using an Intel GPU. Tests with an > nvidia > > GeForce 210 (GT218) show no slowness at all. > > Could some Windows users help me? I'd like to confirm the slowness only > affects Intel graphics cards. Could you test a modified Inkscape binary > (from ftp://download.tuxfamily.org/inkscape/inkscape-12282-cairo-1.12.8.7z), > give your graphic card model and tell me if it's slow or not? IMHO it could > be a blocker for 0.49 on Windows. > >

3 3

non-Unicode symbol fonts do not work on Windows. Bug 165665. Do we need the flag USE_PANGO_WIN32 ?
by Alvin Penner 09 May '15

09 May '15

ref : https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/165665 I believe this bug can be fixed by disabling the flag USE_PANGO_WIN32 in line 19 of src/libnrtype/FontFactory.h. When I do this on Windows XP, I gain about 35 new fonts. Not all of these new fonts are useable, but the most interesting ones, such as CommercialPi, Symbol, Technic, Webdings, Wingdings, MonoType Sorts, TechnicLite are working well, both in Inkscape and in IE9. This is a Windows-specific bug which hides symbol fonts, and does not occur in Gimp 2.6 on Win XP. As far as I can tell, the Gimp source code does not contain any analogue or equivalent of the flag USE_PANGO_WIN32. Would there be any objection if I disable this flag, or does it serve a specific purpose that is essential? tia - Alvin Penner -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/non-Unicode-symbol-fonts-do-not-work-on-Windows.-Bug-… Sent from the Inkscape - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

7 16

Making inkscape usable in valgrind grumble
by mathog 03 Jun '14

03 Jun '14

Hi all, In order to find memory leaks, some types of access violations, and the use of uninitialized variables I depend on valgrind. The problem is that valgrind is barely usable with Inkscape. The output on even the most minimal session (open, type a few letters, format them, close) runs to just under 500K lines and takes 5 minutes to complete. Some of this may be because garbage collection must be turned off in order to use valgrind. That is: export _INKSCAPE_GC=disable; valgrind .... src/inkscape There is no choice in that though, because if it is not done valgrind crashes when it tries to run inkscape. (Ubuntu 12.10.4, 32 bit, current Trunk). There is a libgc.supp in the top of the distribution, but it cannot be used on my system, since it does not suppress valgrind's crash when it tries to run inkscape with GC enabled. Here is the damage seen on a normal exit for a minimal run: ==16527== LEAK SUMMARY: ==16527== definitely lost: 567,697 bytes in 17,670 blocks ==16527== indirectly lost: 2,167,402 bytes in 73,234 blocks ==16527== possibly lost: 21,940,610 bytes in 282,461 blocks ==16527== still reachable: 21,470,100 bytes in 360,304 blocks What can be done so that Inkscape makes a better effort at cleaning up its enormous memory tangle when it exits while running in valgrind? Some of the memory Inksape allocates is cleaned up, but it seems like a very high percentage of memory allocations are tacked into this complex memory structure, and inside valgrind the whole ball of yarn is just dropped on the floor when the program reaches the final exit(), rather than being unwound in an orderly fashion. (In theory GC may be cleaning this up better, but I'm not sure how we can really know, since valgrind cannot tell us.) Could somebody who understands these parts of Inkscape PLEASE clean up this mess, so that in future when "_INKSCAPE_GC==disable" Inkscape will unwind its memory structures before exiting? At the very least we will learn after this unwinding what memory is still left, and that will be the result of existing bugs in the code. Once we obtain a baseline inkscape that is usable once again in valgrind, we can reasonably expect that by using valgrind developers will be able to catch the memory problems they may introduce. Sadly that is far from true now, what with so many thousands of lines of background noise in the log files to slog through. Admittedly some of the lines in valgrind's log file do come from valgrind issues, but the ones I know about can be removed with: cat >wcslen_sse2.supp <<EOD { wcslen1 Memcheck:Addr8 fun:__wcslen_sse2 fun:* } { wcslen2 Memcheck:Cond fun:__wcslen_sse2 fun:* } { iffyinflate Memcheck:Cond fun:inflateReset2 fun:inflateInit2_ obj:* } EOD valgrind -v --leak-check=yes --leak-resolution=high --num-callers=15 --show-reachable=yes --suppressions=./wcslen_sse2.supp --log-file=/tmp/vgfi.log src/inkscape which improves the output to: --16527-- used_suppression: 208319 wcslen1 --16527-- used_suppression: 142 wcslen2 --16527-- used_suppression: 330 iffyinflate ==16527== ==16527== ERROR SUMMARY: 97190 errors from 13437 contexts (suppressed: 208791 from 656) I understand that there may be other problems in some libraries which are called, but from the contents of the log file it looks like the majority of the loose ends were directly created in Inkscape. (And we can use valgrind suppression files, as above, to silence the unfixable library problems.) Thanks, David Mathog mathog@...1176... Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech

4 3

Improved gears extension
by Jürgen Weigert 06 May '14

06 May '14

Just saw braingram's rack gear extension coming in. Nice work! Thank you. But that reminds me that I also have a small contribution to share. Here is an enhanced version of the gears plugin, please also consider this for future inclusion git@...2977...:jnweiger/inkscape-extensions-gears-dev.git cheers, JW-

2 1

INKSCAPE
by Manuel Hiciano 06 Apr '14

06 Apr '14

it is possible to orient the inkspace for something specific drawing, I mean add other features that allow you to work other aspects of technical drawings. Thank you! Waiting for your answers ..

2 3

Warnings check
by Johan Engelen 04 Apr '14

04 Apr '14

Hi all, I'd like people to check what compiler errors are reported for trunk on their system (Windows I can do myself), with these flags: -Wall -Wformat -Werror=format-security -W -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -Woverloaded-virtual -Werror=switch -Werror=return-type -Werror -Wno-error=pointer-sign -Wno-error=unused-parameter -Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable -Wno-error=strict-overflow -Wno-error=write-strings -Wno-error=format -Wno-error=format-extra-args Please no comments about whether you like these flags or not, just what build *errors* you get. (don't send me the warnings please!) (On Windows, with these flags we are down to 3 errorring files, and I'm working on them) Thanks a lot, Johan

12 31

Windows build broken
by Johan Engelen 31 Mar '14

31 Mar '14

Hi all, The Windows build is broken. Possibly after rev. 13225? Error output: compile src/ui/dialog/pixelartdialog.cpp Make error line 304: problem compiling: src/ui/dialog/pixelartdialog.cpp: In member function 'void Inkscape::UI::Dialog::PixelArtDialogImpl::vectorize()': src/ui/dialog/pixelartdialog.cpp:414:65: error: no matching function for call to 'Glib::Thread::create(sigc::bound_mem_functor0<void, Inkscape::UI::Dialog::PixelArtDialogImpl>)' src/ui/dialog/pixelartdialog.cpp:414:65: note: candidates are: c:\devlibs/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/thread.h:228:18: note: static Glib::Thread* Glib::Thread::create(const sigc::slot<void>&, bool) c:\devlibs/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/thread.h:228:18: note: candidate expects 2 arguments, 1 provided c:\devlibs/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/thread.h:273:18: note: static Glib::Thread* Glib::Thread::create(const sigc::slot<void>&, long unsigned int, bool, bool, Glib::ThreadPriority) c:\devlibs/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/thread.h:273:18: note: candidate expects 5 arguments, 1 provided Thanks for the fix, Johan

2 3