can't curate the description in gallery
by brynn
Hi Friends,
When the Curate feature for the gallery first came out, I could edit the
description (along with almost everything about an image). Now it seems I
can't. But that's where the spam is! That's where the spam always will be.
The images seem entirely appropriate, and I would not remove them. But
if I can't delete the spam from the description, the only other option is to
remove the images (3 of them today).
Thoughts? Bug report? Example:
https://inkscape.org/~yendrifernando/%E2%98%85broken-link And there are 2 more
(same member).
Thanks,
brynn
3 years, 11 months
request to join comunity
by Saiba Akhtar
hi, hope you are well.
my name is saiba Akhtar, I am a final year computer science student. seeking to take part and explore my skills in open source software for a module.
I just wanted to know if there is any work I can do for this community.
do let me know please.
thankyou.
yours sincerely,
saiba akhtar
3 years, 11 months
New Gallery System Proposal
by ar j
The current system makes spam a real bore for admins.
I propose a new gallery system. A static site for displaying images (no
need for user-accounts)
The moderation system is used to verify pictures. They are then approved.
Then we have a manual (or automated) build system that adds the pics.
We can then ask people to provide more info when submitting pics. In the
case of blanks we wonder if spam or other format or what.
The moderation system becomes then a verifying system, giving mods some
work to do.
Currently, i tried few times checking in the past but lightning fast brynn
always has already marked wrong ones. My duty is then to vote. Not enough
work to do i think is the reason mods sleep.
The rate of submission is also not so high.
(btw check out JamStack)
Yours,
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
https://github.com/Abdur-rahmaanJ
Mauritius
3 years, 11 months
is voting working for gallery moderation?
by brynn
Hi Friends,
I feel like I should make a report about the current system for gallery
moderation, which uses voting. As brilliant as it is (in my opinion) it doesn't
seem like it will be sustainable for the long run. So far, I can't really say
that it's been successful, for more than a week at a time.
So far, we have not been able to attract a moderator who can either (a)
comprehend the system, or (b) stick around for more than a day or 2. Or perhaps
it could be explained by not finding someone motivated enough, I'm not sure.
We have had several volunteers to moderate, but they seem to have done
so in order to acquire enough access to see what it's about. Once they see,
they take one or 2 voting actions, and never show up again. (I haven't deleted
them off the member list, in case they might start working again, but I might as
well, since they could always re-apply, if they change their mind.)
We did have one moderator who stuck around for quite a while, but whom
needed a good deal of support (more than really is appropriate).
Fortunately for the gallery, when a moderator flags an item, it becomes
hidden. So the gallery doesn't suffer. It's really only the database that
suffers, since the images (or other items) are never really deleted. They're
just piling up on the Moderation Page. (Well, occasionally Moini reports spam,
which I can vote on, which causes it to be deleted. But if I'm the one who
reports it (and I do most of it), no one else ever casts the final votes.)
I'm not sure what the best solution would be. One option would be to go
to the traditional type of system, where one moderator can delete an item. And
certainly, fewer moderators would be needed for that. Currently, one person
could handle all the moderation, with that type of system (and actually does,
for the most part).
For the voting system, we need a 2nd moderator to make the final final
vote. Also, this type of system works best when 2 or more moderators are
communicating, in addition to voting.
For a little while, I could post a message to the Docs list calling
moderators in to clean up the page, and that would work. But lately, it's not.
Otherwise, I'm not sure what other solutions would be possible.
Since developers are currently very busy working on hackfests and 1.0, I
don't think it will hurt to just let things pile up on the Moderation page, for
now. But just so I'm not the only one who knows it, the Moderation Page is
already long enough to make it a good half hour to an hour's work for an
experienced moderator to come in and clean up the page. A new moderator would
need more time, and maybe much more.
(Well, at least it would take that long if they want to read the
messages and participate. Of course it would just take 15 minutes to go in and
vote to delete everything, regardless....in which case, why not go to a
traditional system after all.)
Just a report, for what it's worth :-)
All best,
brynn
3 years, 11 months
