- Inkscape Devel - Inkscape Mailman

Suggestions documentation regarding "Getting Started with Inkscape Development"
by wiesi＠posteo.net 24 Jun '20

24 Jun '20

Hello, I recently filed a pull request and was pointed out to * increase the timeout in "Settings => CI/CD => General Pipelines => Timeout" to 3h * Check the "Allow commits from members who can merge to the target branch" in the pull request settings. I suggest to add a section in "Getting Started with Inkscape Development" on the homepage describing the correct settings and maybe also how to create a fork on gitlab (or just link the gitlab documentation). Cheers, Thomas

2 2

Inkscape Hackfest 2020
by Martin Owens 23 Jun '20

23 Jun '20

Dear Inkscape developers and users, I've been thinking about how best we can host a hackfest for 2020 given all the restrictions. After talking with multiple people, I've decided that the best format for an online hackfest is to have one spread out over the summer. So may I present to everyone the Summer of Hackfest: https://gitlab.com/inkscape/vectors/general/-/issues/161 This gitlab issue is just for organising people's preferences, and thoughts. Once I have times confirmed, I'm going to write everything in the regular hackfest wiki page for everyone. So. The idea here is to take advantage of the online nature of this year's hackfest activity and allow people more breathing room between sessions. Each week I'll be hosting a video chat which you will be free to join and just hang out in and where hopefully some of the important topics will happen once per week. No grueling commitment, no big block of time, just a predictable schedule of lovely inkscape topics which will be publisised to get more people involved than ever before. Please join me on GitLab to proposed topics and set your preferred times. I'm looking for one topic per week, so that's six topics. And thanks for your participation. Best Regards, Martin Owens

1 0

chrome's support for modifying web animations api in it's developers console.
by NASA Jeff 21 Jun '20

21 Jun '20

Chrome seems to do a reasonable job of capturing and modifying web animations API in JavaScript. Its not so hot, however, when it comes to elements that have animations that are programmatically generated, it doesn't even group them all together and identify the source of programmatic generation, which in many cases is just a simple trace of the code. I dare say it could do better than just passively listening out for animation events and actually infer many of the from the source documents.

1 0

[GSoC Paths] Status update
by Moazin Khatri 18 Jun '20

18 Jun '20

Hi everyone, I would like to provide a status update on the Path Library Improvement project. Since this is my first report to the list (the last one wasn't public), I'd like to discuss everything done so far. This report is huge and quite technical, so if you want a short version, it is this: "I have successfully written a relatively short piece of code that creates simplification results totally identical to the livarot version. The algorithm is the same as livarot and is nearly as fast. I'm about to start cleaning it, documenting it and integrating it with simplify, lpe-simplify and pencil tool. This will be done within the next two days." Now the detailed version: According to the original schedule, I was supposed to work on the Path Simplification feature and that is what I have been doing. I started with writing some boilerplate code that will allow me to trigger my own Path Simplification code in Inkscape. This is so that I can compare its results with livarot based simplification quickly. I started exploring the simplification algorithm of lightvarot and wrote some path flattening (the process of approximating a path by line segments) myself. I integrated these in Inkscape and the algorithm produced pretty satisfying results but it was too slow. In a "Release" build, the performance might be okay for a "Path > Simplify" but would do pretty bad in live path effects. For what it's worth, I also created an animation explaining this algorithm. You can find it here: https://moazin.github.io/simplification-algos.html Disappointed by its performance, I replaced the main part of the algorithm with its equivalent from livarot (that's explained in the link attached under the title "Livarot / Simplifying the curve". The performance improved but there were significant differences between the results. I had a choice here, I could either just rewrite a cleaner version of livarot's code or understand what's causing the differences and fix those. I chose to do the latter. I started following the procedure "draw paths -> trigger both algorithms -> debug both simultaneously -> understand and fix the differences -> repeat". Going down this route, I understood almost all the parts of livarot and was even able to discover/fix bugs in both livarot and lightvarot. Here are the reasons behind the differences: 1. The codes for flattening the paths were different so obviously there were differences in the results. I simply implemented livarot's algorithm for splitting cubic beziers to solve this problem. 2. There is an iteration of Newton-Raphson method. (I'll probably add what this iteration is and what it does in the link attached above soon, it's mostly math stuff). I suspect that the code for this iteration in lightvarot is mathematically incorrect, so I fixed it. I will do the derivation again to be sure if it's really a bug though. Anyways, I fixed it by replacing the constants from my derivation (which are identical to the livarot version). 3. There is a special portion in livarot code which fixes what livarot calls the "splotch" problem. When the number of points you're fitting are few, you can sometimes get a fit which fits the points correctly but overall doesn't fit the polyline properly. There is some special code that calculates error differently to take into account this situation and thereby avoid bad fits. My code was missing this code, so I wrote it. 4. There is a slight optimization in livarot that reuses some calculations and I suspect it compromises on the accuracy of the fits. I need to investigate more to be sure. I fixed it in livarot by simply using the non-optimized version. (There are two `AttemptSimplify`) 5. There were some silly bugs in livarot's non-optimized `AttemptSimplify`. A minus was replaced by a plus and a weight factor was commented. Fixed both of those on the livarot side. After doing all of these changes, both versions are producing totally identical results. The computation time is also mostly identical. There is a very minor difference in the flattening part which I'm working on. The code can be found at: https://gitlab.com/moazin/inkscape/-/tree/integrating-livarot-low-redesign My code lives in `src/path/PathSimplifier(.h/.cpp)` and `src/path/PathFlattener(.h/.cpp)`. The temporary verb "Path > MyOperation" triggers code in `src/path/path-myoperation(.h/.cpp)`. The commit history is pretty much garbage since I have been experimenting a lot. Over the weekend I'll be cleaning this code, documenting it properly and integrating it in lpe-simplify and the pencil tool. I'll add the final resulting code "cleanly" on a fresh branch. An interesting part of this project is the "design" of whatever code I write. But I think it's too early for me to start thinking about it because as I move towards Boolean Operations, a lot of new things will be discovered and whatever "design" I decide on would change. So, IMHO, this can be discussed later once I am done with Boolean Operations. Please feel free to ask any questions that you may have or provide feedback. Thank you, Moazin

2 1

C++ & Gtk dependencies
by Alex Valavanis 10 Jun '20

10 Jun '20

Hi All, I just wanted to follow up a couple of recent discussions on our build dependencies. 1. There was some talk of moving to C++17. Tav - I think you were going ahead with a dependency bump in master? Are we still doing this, or did we find any issues? 2. Are we OK to bump to Gtk+ 3.24? AFAIK this is the final Gtk+ 3 version so would be a good stable target for Inkscape 1.1. The only issue would be RHEL/CentOS/Debian LTS are stuck on an older version. My feeling about this kind of thing is that we keep Inkscape 1.0.* as our LTS and push ahead with a dependency bump in master. Best wishes, Alex

6 6

Getting error status/messages for Inkscape actions (when called via activate_action)
by wiesi＠posteo.net 08 Jun '20

08 Jun '20

Hello everyone, is there a possibility to get some error status and/or error messages when executing actions via, e.g., activate_action()? I had a look at the glibmm documentation but couldn't find anything regarding this topic. I've just included executing Inkscape actions from the internal Python interpreter feature I'm porting to the current master branch (https://gitlab.com/wiesi/inkscape/-/tree/python-internal-1) and it would be nice (maybe even mandatory) for the Python user to get some feedback whether an action was successful and a meaningful error message if not. Can anyone point me in the right direction? Does glibmm have some infrastructure for this task that I'm just unable to find or does it really require some extended surgery? Thanks, Thomas

2 2

Re: need help implementing command line args
by intricate machinations 06 Jun '20

06 Jun '20

Small bump. Any help would be appreciated. Should I just try to turn the args into STRING types and manually parse the INT values somewhere?

1 0

Re: need help implementing command line args
by intricate machinations 06 Jun '20

06 Jun '20

Small bump. Any help would be appreciated. Should I just try to turn the args into STRING types and manually parse the INT values somewhere?

1 0

Inkscape Board Meeting
by Ted Gould 02 Jun '20

02 Jun '20

Hello Inkscapers, Your monthly installment of board related excitement is coming up THIS FRIDAY! Everyone is welcome to attend. The meeting is held on Freenode IRC in the #inkscape-devel channel or on https://chat.inkscape.org in the Devel channel (they're linked). It will happen at high noon in Texas, but you can find your local timezone here: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Inkscape+Board+Me… Hope to see you there! Ted

1 0

Web development feature : SVG to HTML
by sagar acharya 29 May '20

29 May '20

Dear developers, Firstly awesome awesome software. I used to use AI but as soon as I saw Inkscape, switched to this despite some change in familiarity. I will always switch from proprietary to libre tool wherever possible. I request you to add a feature where the SVGs would directly export as HTML or HTML+CSS code. Since there are plenty of web designers out there, this would be a very useful resource. Thanking you Sagar

4 3